Linux-Next Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>,
	ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nagarjuna Kristam <nkristam@nvidia.com>,
	"JC Kuo" <jckuo@nvidia.com>, Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:18:31 +0100
Message-ID: <20200327131831.GC2282366@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200327092741.1dbd3242@canb.auug.org.au>


[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2180 bytes --]

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 09:27:41AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the tegra tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   drivers/phy/tegra/Kconfig
>   drivers/phy/tegra/xusb.c
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   5a00c7c7604f ("phy: tegra: xusb: Add usb-role-switch support")
>   23babe30fb45 ("phy: tegra: xusb: Add usb-phy support")
>   d74ce0954cb2 ("phy: tegra: xusb: Add support to get companion USB 3 port")
>   58e7bd08b569 ("phy: tegra: xusb: Add Tegra194 support")
> 
> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
> 
>   f67213cee2b3 ("phy: tegra: xusb: Add usb-role-switch support")
>   e8f7d2f409a1 ("phy: tegra: xusb: Add usb-phy support")
>   5a40fc4b934c ("phy: tegra: xusb: Add support to get companion USB 3 port")
>   1ef535c6ba8e ("phy: tegra: xusb: Add Tegra194 support")
> 
> from the tegra tree.
> 
> These are slightly different patches (the latter has been rebased).
> Also there are further commits affecting these files in the tegra tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I just used the version from the tegra tree) and can
> carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

Olof, Arnd,

There was a bit of back and forth on this because there happened to be a
conflict with the USB tree. I tried to clarify this as replies to the PR
request:

	http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1254523/

But I suspect you may have missed those replies. The bottom line is,
there is a v2 of the pull request that has the patches that are now in
the Tegra tree. That's already part of a PR that went in through the USB
tree as a dependency to resolve the conflict.

So as a result there should be no need for ARM SoC to carry that PR. But
if you still want to merge it, please pull v2, which is here:

	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tegra/linux.git tags/tegra-for-5.7-phy-v2

Sorry for the confusion,
Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply index

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-26 22:27 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-27 13:18 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2020-03-27 13:50   ` Arnd Bergmann
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-06-25  0:12 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-02 11:46 Mark Brown
2013-03-18  4:31 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-18 15:23 ` Stephen Warren
2013-03-18 15:49   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-02 11:52 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-02 11:45 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-23  5:30 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-23  5:25 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-16  3:14 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-16  3:49 ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-16  4:32   ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-16  4:52     ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-16 16:27       ` Olof Johansson
2013-01-16 17:08         ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-16 17:35           ` Olof Johansson
2013-01-16  3:10 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-16  3:12 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200327131831.GC2282366@ulmo \
    --to=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ccross@android.com \
    --cc=clabbe@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jckuo@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nkristam@nvidia.com \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-Next Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/0 linux-next/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-next linux-next/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next \
		linux-next@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-next

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-next


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git