From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE7EC83000 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27A5206A1 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Fdw7gz7M" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728713AbgD1TFF (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:05:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49122 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728539AbgD1TFF (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:05:05 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x343.google.com (mail-ot1-x343.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::343]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3E4FC03C1AB; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:05:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x343.google.com with SMTP id e26so34682167otr.2; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:05:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=9mawD2gvz/eqn5BFKTza4oVQ2SByQxW/24pgvyCMUE8=; b=Fdw7gz7MMVRw9oItUSWDsiTku21evW1zad4hFmvLnJEQYB25msghyg8QPQMeTxErrg xfhyK4xVf2Nw5qnZLBngikg5i99Mzng3gvVBZlhV1MHkx36wpr0N9dsjmcGz7lKtkYlv R1kPrvqAyfQlciybOZJB9mlsDpBAPp/bsb0/KxKz8fJXMmuP0kH6k+oVtaW8qPthLaJe UMHLt5U8/mn9DQ0v843hXBGhWu5esf3JikvFUxMWgx8fZZP6c6O/Wvd8WLb5vpCDCAYp bAT9VNr2S2TozkuextPiUIFVM0/0OV92JrJg+D61BG//01Yt4OdpMgM8SbiwR/dKn0hh 3uZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=9mawD2gvz/eqn5BFKTza4oVQ2SByQxW/24pgvyCMUE8=; b=aw/XSBb2UdUbRIoALJUzE+PTa4+rSYAcSqr4MQ9UnfZ19Noes4hmxJesYCwxBdX3Ba Chp7PMw1ipxqFB1S4aBE0eWtwTHOKtbGJdUzg9MDn3vf+jyW0hNyiJdIWAWBUch3dXPF 4HWITmAG7bpEf6/SsWCDzIwYUaVy6fk80nCF/h78F4L1YS3Ezilcip4YnwPo/VygHGEo M/PLYpom0KFdHmneaKpCDm6/uzpj3cptPVf7kZTj5zXwnCak+w680JzvEO8EJlzq4OIX CaOQa5ys3t4J52R5rzR6/JqjmklfPBnxFYBUXIbwSp9DF8NqHdCmhdZqtcSJzLz4nFF2 UPIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYnxCjeVodmjPjX0nPddByziWXVhz80Kp5QaaMODDHzsqKmKosP YP5yMiYeLMWGEJzFZDwYgyw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKQbJq0XD420xh+OdLmBYlmBeL4TIoGxvn2rlBhDIrLX4rpFLBUzLsA6hEWYXqgEBS8v4qsAw== X-Received: by 2002:aca:488a:: with SMTP id v132mr4198275oia.166.1588100704232; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:05:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ubuntu-s3-xlarge-x86 ([2604:1380:4111:8b00::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t10sm5186959oou.38.2020.04.28.12.05.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:05:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:04:59 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Minchan Kim , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 28 Message-ID: <20200428190459.GA2299615@ubuntu-s3-xlarge-x86> References: <20200428181006.06b4e3bc@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200428181006.06b4e3bc@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:10:06PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200424: > > The qcom tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. > > The hwmon-staging tree gained a build failure for which I reverted > a commit. > > The mac80211-next tree gained a build failure so I used the version > from next-20200424. > > The drm-misc tree still had its build failure for which I disabled a > COMPILE_TEST setting. > > The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against the risc-v tree. > > The akpm tree lost a patch that turned up elsewhere. > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4451 > 5474 files changed, 151275 insertions(+), 63274 deletions(-) I am seeing the following build error on s390 defconfig, caused by commit 743f242d65ec ("mm: support compat_sys_process_madvise"). Apologies if it has already been reported, I did a search of lore and found nothing. Cheers, Nathan $ make -j$(nproc) -s ARCH=s390 CROSS_COMPILE=s390x-linux- defconfig all ... mm/madvise.c: In function '__se_compat_sys_process_madvise': ./include/linux/compiler.h:394:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_162' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: sizeof(unsigned long) > 4 && !__TYPE_IS_PTR(unsigned long) 394 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) | ^ ./include/linux/compiler.h:375:4: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert' 375 | prefix ## suffix(); \ | ^~~~~~ ./include/linux/compiler.h:394:2: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert' 394 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert' 39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG' 50 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./arch/s390/include/asm/compat.h:18:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON' 18 | BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(t) > 4 && !__TYPE_IS_PTR(t)); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/syscalls.h:110:27: note: in expansion of macro '__SC_DELOUSE' 110 | #define __MAP3(m,t,a,...) m(t,a), __MAP2(m,__VA_ARGS__) | ^ ./include/linux/syscalls.h:111:35: note: in expansion of macro '__MAP3' 111 | #define __MAP4(m,t,a,...) m(t,a), __MAP3(m,__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~ ./include/linux/syscalls.h:112:35: note: in expansion of macro '__MAP4' 112 | #define __MAP5(m,t,a,...) m(t,a), __MAP4(m,__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~ ./include/linux/syscalls.h:113:35: note: in expansion of macro '__MAP5' 113 | #define __MAP6(m,t,a,...) m(t,a), __MAP5(m,__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~ ./include/linux/syscalls.h:114:22: note: in expansion of macro '__MAP6' 114 | #define __MAP(n,...) __MAP##n(__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~ ./arch/s390/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:80:36: note: in expansion of macro '__MAP' 80 | long ret = __do_compat_sys##name(__MAP(x,__SC_DELOUSE,__VA_ARGS__));\ | ^~~~~ ./include/linux/compat.h:66:2: note: in expansion of macro 'COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINEx' 66 | COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINEx(6, _##name, __VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/madvise.c:1314:1: note: in expansion of macro 'COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE6' 1314 | COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE6(process_madvise, int, which, compat_pid_t, upid, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/compiler.h:394:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_164' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: sizeof(unsigned long) > 4 && !__TYPE_IS_PTR(unsigned long) 394 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) | ^ ./include/linux/compiler.h:375:4: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert' 375 | prefix ## suffix(); \ | ^~~~~~ ./include/linux/compiler.h:394:2: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert' 394 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert' 39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG' 50 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./arch/s390/include/asm/compat.h:18:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON' 18 | BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(t) > 4 && !__TYPE_IS_PTR(t)); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/syscalls.h:108:27: note: in expansion of macro '__SC_DELOUSE' 108 | #define __MAP1(m,t,a,...) m(t,a) | ^ ./include/linux/syscalls.h:109:35: note: in expansion of macro '__MAP1' 109 | #define __MAP2(m,t,a,...) m(t,a), __MAP1(m,__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~ ./include/linux/syscalls.h:110:35: note: in expansion of macro '__MAP2' 110 | #define __MAP3(m,t,a,...) m(t,a), __MAP2(m,__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~ ./include/linux/syscalls.h:111:35: note: in expansion of macro '__MAP3' 111 | #define __MAP4(m,t,a,...) m(t,a), __MAP3(m,__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~ ./include/linux/syscalls.h:112:35: note: in expansion of macro '__MAP4' 112 | #define __MAP5(m,t,a,...) m(t,a), __MAP4(m,__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~ ./include/linux/syscalls.h:113:35: note: in expansion of macro '__MAP5' 113 | #define __MAP6(m,t,a,...) m(t,a), __MAP5(m,__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~ ./include/linux/syscalls.h:114:22: note: in expansion of macro '__MAP6' 114 | #define __MAP(n,...) __MAP##n(__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~ ./arch/s390/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:80:36: note: in expansion of macro '__MAP' 80 | long ret = __do_compat_sys##name(__MAP(x,__SC_DELOUSE,__VA_ARGS__));\ | ^~~~~ ./include/linux/compat.h:66:2: note: in expansion of macro 'COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINEx' 66 | COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINEx(6, _##name, __VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/madvise.c:1314:1: note: in expansion of macro 'COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE6' 1314 | COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE6(process_madvise, int, which, compat_pid_t, upid, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:266: mm/madvise.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[1]: *** [Makefile:1723: mm] Error 2 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... ...