From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794A7C433E1 for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 06:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551A3207D4 for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 06:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="EiSLHgBj" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726040AbgERGVO (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2020 02:21:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37700 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726511AbgERGVN (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2020 02:21:13 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1043.google.com (mail-pj1-x1043.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1043]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70EFAC061A0C for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 23:21:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1043.google.com with SMTP id q24so4544159pjd.1 for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 23:21:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CLsaehW9Taz3Ka2xzbMpVHvc/9aQdrIOzWvQKJbc0kE=; b=EiSLHgBjAVCSuePRSDJU4JXRufEb1wYy1y3Q27ccRsMCHmfQSmrKsnI2fRgyVd2FXz hm63j+UgR8r/8xnub9nQkN5LYkoQedtczIPIB+cChMkmdliFv3+cqSMy5lBjWx7aDZS8 sN6K0iR3USlVgGpAtqCvo6WMBa9HDwPjayMcc+fuMSzHOgLJtp3FFvpvBslUJSjfUoWK sRO823x53zWtBLZwO0q/CPgaQqYbtkhF202bLMXHQ5/s+kt/Esux+d/9MYAlPjc3zPnF QgOAVAWDAbEGx5DgFonbUuHjYpRBEjsF8z4npMjcCe76T7+fgV3uomXmx8u8Q3ydU33R wLww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CLsaehW9Taz3Ka2xzbMpVHvc/9aQdrIOzWvQKJbc0kE=; b=P4aU1Na62GdN1gKsZPzaazsDyqNi01WzYJYZzohOYRO5yGAlWefnK23lk/nXZtxwUj JoVLw7MxSWtOAB39EIumaNAOfDRLHZ5yJvmzd0Y3pLyeq+llNJiSfNTRgcmh+Kjmdixw N8dcibTyPuTOLm9iDu204nfaIF5FolQXU7guSbOCuMdQCCQzfC0XzdRji7bKFfXL4Zd4 RRnM29hjP/upI22ICuSL9cl93xObTumhG22bPdXg9d+8t9G9sH49DIJK6XG7jpE7ln1C t/ERy8xwHXIM8S5ffGauNIqufIRoXEDOWkZb7jjkXbnGU/U/b1nCBUNjJuvxEU6jxlSd bbqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5313TQaejOixHq/zd8VqLJhQovIgg79YRky4O2tt9FspNNZzvHtP WKkv5sNaLaslPXKPw8YNdWg1jA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxjulgCG8gVRBS1hVOMUlGaMrT8f8O4l9B1jasxoYD2DJgZjrJpfy+Buv2OROr94ELwG55cMA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:59d0:: with SMTP id d16mr14408068plj.181.1589782872479; Sun, 17 May 2020 23:21:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from builder.lan (104-188-17-28.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net. [104.188.17.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c24sm5025027pjs.51.2020.05.17.23.21.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 17 May 2020 23:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 23:19:48 -0700 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: John Stultz , Andy Gross , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the qcom tree Message-ID: <20200518061948.GA2165@builder.lan> References: <20200415104152.4d770116@canb.auug.org.au> <20200421092935.21eeb395@canb.auug.org.au> <20200518151635.5b36916b@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200518151635.5b36916b@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Sun 17 May 22:16 PDT 2020, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:41:56 -0700 John Stultz wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 4:29 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 18:18:11 -0700 John Stultz wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 5:41 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > > > > After merging the qcom tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > > > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > > > > > > > drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c: In function '__tcs_buffer_write': > > > > > drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c:484:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_rpmh_send_msg_rcuidle'; did you mean 'trace_rpmh_send_msg_enabled'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > > > 484 | trace_rpmh_send_msg_rcuidle(drv, tcs_id, j, msgid, cmd); > > > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > | trace_rpmh_send_msg_enabled > > > > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > > > > > > > > > I don't know why this error only started happening today. However > > > > > reverting commit > > > > > > > > > > 1d3c6f86fd3f ("soc: qcom: rpmh: Allow RPMH driver to be loaded as a module") > > > > > > > > > > fixes the build, so I have done that for today. > > > > > > > > > > > > Ah. I'm guessing the newly added rpmh-rsc code depends on rpmh being built in. > > > > > > > > I'll take a look at it. > > > > > > I am still reverting that commit. > > > > Yea. I've stirred up some discussion on it, but its fairly > > complicated. Unfortunately I suspect it will take some time to confirm > > and justify the change I think is needed, so I think reverting this is > > the best short term plan. > > I am still reverting that commit. It is probably time (we are beyond > -rc6 now) that it is either reverted or fixed in the qcom tree, please. > Thanks for the reminder Stephen, I've pushed the revert out to the qcom branch now. Regards, Bjorn