linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the powerpc tree
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 17:23:16 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200519172316.3b37cbae@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 765 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in:

  arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c

between commit:

  116ac378bb3f ("powerpc/64s: machine check interrupt update NMI accounting")

from the powerpc tree and commit:

  187416eeb388 ("hardirq/nmi: Allow nested nmi_enter()")

from the rcu tree.

I fixed it up (I used the powerpc tree version for now) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2020-05-19  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-19  7:23 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2020-05-20  4:12 ` linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the powerpc tree Michael Ellerman
2020-05-21  4:51 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-21 13:35   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-05-21 20:38     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-06-03  2:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-02-03  2:03 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200519172316.3b37cbae@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).