From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 16:22:34 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200529162234.4f1c3d58@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1001 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in:
kernel/rcu/tree.c
between commits:
806f04e9fd2c ("rcu: Allow for smp_call_function() running callbacks from idle")
aaf2bc50df1f ("rcu: Abstract out rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() from rcu_nmi_enter()")
from the tip tree and commit:
3f3baaf3ac07 ("rcu/tree: Remove dynticks_nmi_nesting counter")
c0601bb42994 ("rcu/tree: Clean up dynticks counter usage")
3f3baaf3ac07 ("rcu/tree: Remove dynticks_nmi_nesting counter")
from the rcu tree.
I fixed it up (I punted and took some from the former and some from the
latter) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned
to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.
You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2020-05-29 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-29 6:22 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2020-05-29 6:41 ` linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-29 14:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-05-29 23:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-27 1:55 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-06 2:45 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-06 16:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-21 18:17 broonie
2021-10-12 4:48 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-13 16:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-08-17 7:09 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-23 5:33 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-22 4:51 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-22 4:47 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-22 5:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-22 17:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-09 4:59 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-29 6:23 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-26 3:14 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-25 2:44 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-25 3:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-24 3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-24 4:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-03-25 3:08 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-25 3:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-03-25 21:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-19 0:50 Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-19 1:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-19 1:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-19 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-19 13:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-16 23:37 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-22 2:27 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-26 19:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-11-10 2:14 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-22 4:13 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-31 3:50 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-31 16:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-01 0:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-08-01 4:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-01 4:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-08-01 16:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-01 13:43 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-01 13:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-01 14:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-01 14:17 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-01 14:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-08-01 14:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-01 15:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-08-01 21:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-07-18 5:26 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-19 3:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-06-09 5:14 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-09 15:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-03-04 4:13 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-04 15:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-16 2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-07 3:56 Stephen Rothwell
2014-02-24 4:18 Stephen Rothwell
2014-02-24 4:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-05 3:59 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-05 16:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-05 17:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-23 3:01 Stephen Rothwell
2012-08-23 3:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-22 4:27 Stephen Rothwell
2012-08-22 5:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-22 4:27 Stephen Rothwell
2012-08-22 5:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-20 4:47 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-20 15:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200529162234.4f1c3d58@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).