linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with Linus' tree
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 11:26:06 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200604112606.25ffde35@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6092c5eb-6e50-97bc-90db-4f7a0ca29c6e@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2572 bytes --]

Hi David,

On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 20:30:34 -0600 David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/1/20 5:20 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> > 
> > On Mon, 11 May 2020 13:00:15 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:  
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the ipsec-next tree got conflicts in:
> >>
> >>   net/ipv4/xfrm4_output.c
> >>   net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c
> >>
> >> between commit:
> >>
> >>   0c922a4850eb ("xfrm: Always set XFRM_TRANSFORMED in xfrm{4,6}_output_finish")
> >>
> >> from Linus' tree and commit:
> >>
> >>   2ab6096db2f1 ("xfrm: remove output_finish indirection from xfrm_state_afinfo")
> >>
> >> from the ipsec-next tree.
> >>
> >> I fixed it up (I used the latter versions of these files and then added
> >> the following patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
> >> as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
> >> be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> >> merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> >> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> >>
> >> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> >> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 12:57:24 +1000
> >> Subject: [PATCH] xfrm: merge fixup for "remove output_finish indirection from xfrm_state_afinfo"
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> >> ---
> >>  net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c | 4 ----
> >>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
> >> index 886a9b284b3a..0f4b3a5e02ba 100644
> >> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
> >> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
> >> @@ -574,16 +574,12 @@ int xfrm_output(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >>  	switch (x->outer_mode.family) {
> >>  	case AF_INET:
> >>  		memset(IPCB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IPCB(skb)));
> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER
> >>  		IPCB(skb)->flags |= IPSKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED;
> >> -#endif
> >>  		break;
> >>  	case AF_INET6:
> >>  		memset(IP6CB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IP6CB(skb)));
> >>  
> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER
> >>  		IP6CB(skb)->flags |= IP6SKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED;
> >> -#endif
> >>  		break;
> >>  	}
> >>    
> > 
> > It looks like this merge resolution fix up was missed when the
> > ipsec-next tree was merged into the net-next tree.
> >   
> 
> Thanks for catching that, Stephen. Important fix in 0c922a4850eb.
> 

And now the net-next tree has been merged into Linus' tree without this fix :-(

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-04  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-11  3:00 linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-01 23:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-02  2:30   ` David Ahern
2020-06-04  1:26     ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2020-06-04  2:55       ` David Ahern
2020-06-04  6:41         ` Steffen Klassert
2020-06-04 12:44           ` David Ahern
2020-06-05  9:18             ` Steffen Klassert
2020-06-16 13:39             ` David Ahern
2020-06-16 16:23               ` Steffen Klassert
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-02  3:40 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200604112606.25ffde35@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).