From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454B2C433E1 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 15:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A320206B6 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 15:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728945AbgGLP4J (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jul 2020 11:56:09 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:9570 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728862AbgGLP4J (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jul 2020 11:56:09 -0400 IronPort-SDR: gtZ0+BJeqJIUTrO4JtYHtjS0uK7NUDdZSie7KQDvXStAqz109mfkH408jmANaZM4TixGqiZz6p LD8zar3bsbbw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9680"; a="213356442" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,344,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="213356442" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Jul 2020 08:56:07 -0700 IronPort-SDR: JdTuZxEkMGnFOXKB74JNpTt+CW43JULWUHX4O7LI5I6Ir9rBXUVgAM77tnxesux05hkj3DxO/K MrHdML6TGmfw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,344,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="285139095" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2020 08:56:03 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1jueKi-001RE6-GH; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 18:56:04 +0300 Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 18:56:04 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 10 Message-ID: <20200712155604.GA342822@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20200710183318.7b808092@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200710183318.7b808092@canb.auug.org.au> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 06:33:18PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200709: > > My fixes tree contains: > > dbf24e30ce2e ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning") > b236d81d9e4f ("powerpc/boot/dts: Fix dtc "pciex" warnings") > > The kbuild tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. > > The scmi tree lost its build failure. > > The drm tree gained a conflict against the drm-fixes tree. > > The security tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. > > The tip tree still had one build failure for which I reverted a commit > and gained a conflict against the spi tree. > > The pidfd tree gained a conflict against the seccomp tree. > > The akpm-current tree lost its build failure but gained a conflict > against the risc-v tree. > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 6231 > 7061 files changed, 371498 insertions(+), 144830 deletions(-) I can't build it on Debian with Sparse enabled CC init/main.o init/main.c:760:20: warning: no previous prototype for ‘mem_encrypt_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 760 | void __init __weak mem_encrypt_init(void) { } | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CHECK /home/andy/prj/linux-topic-uart/init/main.c include/linux/compiler.h:309:16: error: typename in expression include/linux/compiler.h:309:16: error: Expected ) in function call include/linux/compiler.h:309:16: error: got : ... (All READ_ONCE() entries fail) Is it known issue? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko