From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432CEC433E3 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 05:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BEC6208E4 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 05:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="qlsUEVfW" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726673AbgGTFhL (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2020 01:37:11 -0400 Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:54493 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726045AbgGTFhK (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2020 01:37:10 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B99Tc3QHKz9sRN; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:37:08 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1595223428; bh=2XgeZBjjdE0EpxfJtO9yXEaHdZMYFiS96jVy6kfAMZM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qlsUEVfWLhZzsoGzVlHp4kZq8qiAa6D5Om5fTtMuWSeNBwrT++rUkJ9L+HPA6Ym2h dq1LXz+GdkdigcGaojJ45vM7QwW0poZ5TKCOYroY4uqOrAnok4NkdN1j3pA6dxRm5e gUw2SkLPB+f8VDsuFeqPCQZp2ss+rxedWeEG3f6UavxxDBliaLU1BcuP0uQgF4WF3N Jwu6dNahdOFOWEgwkHSlg2Wp2kBLarMI7DI58S4tor4UiFFzrm8WxIr0EdDr/MvOQ6 kJquRxwR5KD4xV2516E6bopxvuhF6o/CxfJraDDnvtu1c8bttF3+0+Kk85PCXIk/xl UfW+jZvczW1eA== Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:37:06 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree Message-ID: <20200720153706.440b86b5@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20200714135012.447d185c@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20200622113700.3dd74527@canb.auug.org.au> <20200630125459.0ca67c38@canb.auug.org.au> <20200707123301.79ca8a94@canb.auug.org.au> <20200714135012.447d185c@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/Mns_sDvtX/2R3KX_Xse_pB5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/Mns_sDvtX/2R3KX_Xse_pB5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 13:50:12 +1000 Stephen Rothwell = wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 12:33:01 +1000 Stephen Rothwell = wrote: > > > > On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:54:59 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: =20 > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:37:00 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: =20 > > > > > > > > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmod= config) > > > > failed like this: > > > >=20 > > > > ERROR: modpost: "sched_setscheduler" [kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benc= hmark.ko] undefined! > > > >=20 > > > > Caused by commit > > > >=20 > > > > 616d91b68cd5 ("sched: Remove sched_setscheduler*() EXPORTs") > > > >=20 > > > > Missed one :-) > > > >=20 > > > > I have reverted that commit for today. =20 > > >=20 > > > I am still reverting that commit. =20 > >=20 > > Ditto ... =20 >=20 > Ping? OK, it has now been three weeks ... I must admit I was a little suprised that initial testing of the tip tree (or even the branch that this commit is on) did not pick this up. Unless there is something really weird going on here, Linus will notice if you try to get him to pull this as he tests with an x86_64 allmodconfig build. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/Mns_sDvtX/2R3KX_Xse_pB5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAl8VLYIACgkQAVBC80lX 0GwklAf/QO1rgP8S5l24OL7AOPztYJ3K+g/LfkrM2C5KVqrNqs4s8Gibgc+jXjLD GcfmJ9DUgAlh6868Z6CRhKS9dxZCwojICPrJxDQ6Kbxb7/27oOdY1mAABBy7IOZq YO4GeJ9804pRzVXO+CDKsvcWMTiig60cjELmpqBS3j0AkkSdiVUYTE1vuJERRAjy AVhyshcgRQRNZ/7innrdIedENhDFabukPYNntOylbREJ/O7MyVVS5x6POgKn5NuF wFMU+KhL1eI7ZFGqUIAmbi+vmxjd9w0XidfnhjaPp1s4X68Qkeg8PkHvPbUhOkpz gCZlHd+sEounzSD61fz8mz0itFlrWA== =IZ0s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Mns_sDvtX/2R3KX_Xse_pB5--