Hi all, On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 15:35:10 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: > > arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h > > between commit: > > c196049cc732 ("x86: switch to ->regset_get()") > > from the vfs tree and commit: > > ce711ea3cab9 ("perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES/XRSTORS for LBR context switch") > > from the tip tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > > diff --cc arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h > index f691ea1bc086,1559554af931..000000000000 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h > @@@ -71,8 -103,9 +103,9 @@@ extern void __init update_regset_xstate > void *get_xsave_addr(struct xregs_state *xsave, int xfeature_nr); > const void *get_xsave_field_ptr(int xfeature_nr); > int using_compacted_format(void); > + int xfeature_size(int xfeature_nr); > -int copy_xstate_to_kernel(void *kbuf, struct xregs_state *xsave, unsigned int offset, unsigned int size); > -int copy_xstate_to_user(void __user *ubuf, struct xregs_state *xsave, unsigned int offset, unsigned int size); > +struct membuf; > +void copy_xstate_to_kernel(struct membuf to, struct xregs_state *xsave); > int copy_kernel_to_xstate(struct xregs_state *xsave, const void *kbuf); > int copy_user_to_xstate(struct xregs_state *xsave, const void __user *ubuf); > void copy_supervisor_to_kernel(struct xregs_state *xsave); This is now a conflict between the vfs tree and Linus' tree. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell