From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Yangtao Li <frank@allwinnertech.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sunxi tree with the arm-soc tree
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:20:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201008132017.ju5ih5prn4aifeml@gilmour.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201006145637.57d20ba1@canb.auug.org.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1242 bytes --]
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 02:56:37PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the sunxi tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a100.dtsi
>
> between commit:
>
> 0dea1794f3b4 ("arm64: allwinner: A100: add the basical Allwinner A100 DTSI file")
>
> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
>
> 7e66a778cb8b ("arm64: allwinner: A100: add the basical Allwinner A100 DTSI file")
>
> from the sunxi tree.
>
> These are 2 versions of the same patch. For now I am just using the
> version in the arm-soc tree ... please sort this out.
>
> I fixed it up (see above) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
The branch in arm-soc has a build breakage (that doesn't happen in
linux-next since the clk tree has the commit to fix it) so I sent a new
PR
Once that PR is in arm-soc, I guess that merge issue will go away
maxime
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-08 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-06 3:56 linux-next: manual merge of the sunxi tree with the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-08 13:20 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2020-10-25 21:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-26 12:35 ` Maxime Ripard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-10-30 12:22 Mark Brown
2017-10-30 13:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-08 0:13 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-27 23:36 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-28 8:37 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-11-24 0:16 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201008132017.ju5ih5prn4aifeml@gilmour.lan \
--to=maxime@cerno.tech \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=frank@allwinnertech.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).