linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree
@ 2020-10-15  3:21 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2020-10-15  3:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Borislav Petkov, Kyung Min Park, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Linux Next Mailing List, Ricardo Neri, Rob Herring

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1079 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:

  Documentation/x86/index.rst

between commit:

  ea4e3bef4c94 ("Documentation/x86: Add documentation for /proc/cpuinfo feature flags")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  441848282c59 ("dt: Remove booting-without-of.rst")

from the devicetree tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc Documentation/x86/index.rst
index 740ee7f87898,1faf44f551bd..000000000000
--- a/Documentation/x86/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/x86/index.rst
@@@ -9,7 -9,7 +9,8 @@@ x86-specific Documentatio
     :numbered:
  
     boot
+    booting-dt
 +   cpuinfo
     topology
     exception-tables
     kernel-stacks

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree
@ 2024-04-16  3:42 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2024-04-16  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Herve Codina, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1096 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/of/dynamic.c

between commit:

  8917e7385346 ("of: dynamic: Synchronize of_changeset_destroy() with the devlink removals")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  40b0f17453fc ("of: Use scope based kfree() cleanups")

from the devicetree tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/of/dynamic.c
index 4d57a4e34105,43f4e2c93bd2..000000000000
--- a/drivers/of/dynamic.c
+++ b/drivers/of/dynamic.c
@@@ -9,7 -9,7 +9,8 @@@
  
  #define pr_fmt(fmt)	"OF: " fmt
  
 +#include <linux/device.h>
+ #include <linux/cleanup.h>
  #include <linux/of.h>
  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
  #include <linux/slab.h>

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree
@ 2022-01-14 23:41 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2022-01-14 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Linux Next Mailing List, Rob Herring, Sam Protsenko,
	Stanislav Jakubek

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1359 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:

  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml

between commit:

  2d6a1c7d5772 ("dt-bindings: Add vendor prefix for WinLink")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  ea800bc1bd93 ("dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: add Wingtech")

from the devicetree tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
index b3de81e8290f,a2efbc26d945..000000000000
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
@@@ -1338,8 -1332,8 +1346,10 @@@ patternProperties
      description: Wiligear, Ltd.
    "^winbond,.*":
      description: Winbond Electronics corp.
 +  "^winlink,.*":
 +    description: WinLink Co., Ltd
+   "^wingtech,.*":
+     description: Wingtech Technology Co., Ltd.
    "^winstar,.*":
      description: Winstar Display Corp.
    "^wits,.*":

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree
@ 2019-11-12  2:57 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-11-12  2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Neil Armstrong

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 843 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:

  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/amlogic,dwc3.txt

between commit:

  976392650a00 ("bindings: rename links to mason USB2/USB3 DT files")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  6aec97513a8c ("dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Move Amlogic G12A DWC3 Glue Bindings to YAML schemas")

from the devicetree tree.

I fixed it up (the latter removed the lines updated by the former) and
can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree
@ 2019-10-16  1:25 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-10-16  1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Maxime Ripard, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Alexandre Torgue

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1408 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:

  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml

between commit:

  3aa3c66aedef ("dt-bindings: usb: Bring back phy-names")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  02ceb12c20f5 ("dt-bindings: usb: generic-ehci: Add "companion" entry")

from the devicetree tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
index 1ca64c85191a,ce8854bc8c84..000000000000
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
@@@ -63,11 -63,12 +63,16 @@@ properties
      description:
        Set this flag to force EHCI reset after resume.
  
+   companion:
+     $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
+     description:
+      Phandle of a companion.
+ 
 -  phys: true
 +  phys:
 +    description: PHY specifier for the USB PHY
 +
 +  phy-names:
 +    const: usb
  
  required:
    - compatible

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree
  2019-07-24  3:02 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2019-07-24 19:31 ` Rob Herring
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2019-07-24 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Luca Weiss,
	Maxime Ripard

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 9:02 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:
>
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/sun4i-lradc-keys.txt
>
> between commit:
>
>   355fb0e54e85 ("dt-bindings: input: sun4i-lradc-keys: Add A64 compatible")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
>   3f587b3b77b9 ("dt-bindings: input: Convert Allwinner LRADC to a schema")
>
> from the devicetree tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I removed the file - the additions from the former
> have been incorporated into the latter) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

I've updated my for-next branch to 5.3-rc1, so this should be resolved now.

Rob

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree
@ 2019-07-24  3:02 Stephen Rothwell
  2019-07-24 19:31 ` Rob Herring
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-07-24  3:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Luca Weiss,
	Maxime Ripard

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 874 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:

  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/sun4i-lradc-keys.txt

between commit:

  355fb0e54e85 ("dt-bindings: input: sun4i-lradc-keys: Add A64 compatible")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  3f587b3b77b9 ("dt-bindings: input: Convert Allwinner LRADC to a schema")

from the devicetree tree.

I fixed it up (I removed the file - the additions from the former
have been incorporated into the latter) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree
  2019-06-24  5:51 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2019-07-08 23:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-07-08 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Thomas Gleixner, Greg Kroah-Hartman

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1134 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:51:24 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   scripts/dtc/Makefile.dtc
>   scripts/dtc/libfdt/Makefile.libfdt
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   ec8f24b7faaf ("treewide: Add SPDX license identifier - Makefile/Kconfig")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   12869ecd5eef ("scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version v1.5.0-30-g702c1b6c0e73")
> 
> from the devicetree tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I used the latter's SPDX tags as these come from an
> upstream project) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
> as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
> be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

I am still getting this conflict (the commit ids may have changed).
Just a reminder in case you think Linus may need to know.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree
@ 2019-06-24  5:51 Stephen Rothwell
  2019-07-08 23:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-06-24  5:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Thomas Gleixner, Greg Kroah-Hartman

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 861 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got conflicts in:

  scripts/dtc/Makefile.dtc
  scripts/dtc/libfdt/Makefile.libfdt

between commit:

  ec8f24b7faaf ("treewide: Add SPDX license identifier - Makefile/Kconfig")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  12869ecd5eef ("scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version v1.5.0-30-g702c1b6c0e73")

from the devicetree tree.

I fixed it up (I used the latter's SPDX tags as these come from an
upstream project) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree
@ 2019-02-14  3:02 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-02-14  3:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Otto Sabart

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 875 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:

  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic-v3.txt

between commit:

  8217724eb7c5 ("doc: bindings: fix bad reference to ARM CPU bindings")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  36c79bc7ef79 ("dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Convert ARM GICv3 to json-schema")

from the devicetree tree.

I fixed it up (the latter also did the update from the former, so I just
removed the file) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree
@ 2017-09-06  3:01 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2017-09-06  3:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Florian Fainelli, David S. Miller

Hi Rob,

Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:

  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,bgmac-nsp.txt

between commit:

  ea6c3077678f ("dt-bindings: net: Remove duplicate NSP Ethernet MAC binding document")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  4da722ca19f3 ("dt-bindings: Remove "status" from examples")

from the devicetree tree.

I fixed it up (the former removed the file, so I did that) and can
carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.



-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree
@ 2017-09-06  2:55 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2017-09-06  2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Antoine Ténart, Herbert Xu

Hi Rob,

Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:

  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/inside-secure-safexcel.txt

between commit:

  6eb8844bf4be ("Documentation/bindings: crypto: remove the dma-mask property")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  4da722ca19f3 ("dt-bindings: Remove "status" from examples")

from the devicetree tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/inside-secure-safexcel.txt
index 941bb6a6fb13,c08d5ad79b1f..000000000000
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/inside-secure-safexcel.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/inside-secure-safexcel.txt
@@@ -23,5 -24,5 +23,4 @@@ Example
  		interrupt-names = "mem", "ring0", "ring1", "ring2", "ring3",
  				  "eip";
  		clocks = <&cpm_syscon0 1 26>;
- 		status = "disabled";
 -		dma-mask = <0xff 0xffffffff>;
  	};

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree
@ 2011-08-05  2:13 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-08-05  2:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Grant Likely; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 488 bytes --]

Hi Grant,

Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in
drivers/of/base.c between commit fe55c1844a1c ("Revert "dt: add
of_alias_scan and of_alias_get_id"") from Linus' tree and commit
79787f21b37b ("drivers/of: Fix sparc build failure caused by
of_alias_scan") from the devicetree tree.

Given the discussion on other threads, I used Linus' version.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree
  2010-07-16  1:15 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2010-07-16  4:27 ` Grant Likely
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2010-07-16  4:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Yinghai Lu, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
	Andres Salomon

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in
> arch/sparc/kernel/prom_64.c between commit
> 95f72d1ed41a66f1c1c29c24d479de81a0bea36f ("lmb: rename to memblock") from
> Linus' tree and commit 035ebefc737cce56d3938e9b7eaa5ac0e9c28715
> ("of/sparc: move is_root_node() to of.h") from the devicetree tree.
>
> Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix for
> a while.

Okay, thanks Stephen.

g.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree
@ 2010-07-16  1:15 Stephen Rothwell
  2010-07-16  4:27 ` Grant Likely
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-07-16  1:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Grant Likely
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Yinghai Lu, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
	Andres Salomon

Hi Grant,

Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in
arch/sparc/kernel/prom_64.c between commit
95f72d1ed41a66f1c1c29c24d479de81a0bea36f ("lmb: rename to memblock") from
Linus' tree and commit 035ebefc737cce56d3938e9b7eaa5ac0e9c28715
("of/sparc: move is_root_node() to of.h") from the devicetree tree.

Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix for
a while.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/sparc/kernel/prom_64.c
index 466a327,0bffafd..0000000
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_64.c
@@@ -20,8 -20,8 +20,8 @@@
  #include <linux/string.h>
  #include <linux/mm.h>
  #include <linux/module.h>
 -#include <linux/lmb.h>
 +#include <linux/memblock.h>
- #include <linux/of_device.h>
+ #include <linux/of.h>
  
  #include <asm/prom.h>
  #include <asm/oplib.h>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree
  2010-06-07  2:53 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2010-06-07 17:03 ` Grant Likely
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2010-06-07 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel

On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c between commit
> 1f23b2d98c11fed43c552a5dbd00c793f81a8736 ("usb: fix ehci_hcd build
> failure when both generic-OF and xilinx is selected") from the  tree and
> commit 4c018c4ab1edd8f4154848868960ebe132c3d138 ("usb/of: fix build
> errors") from the devicetree tree.
>
> They look like two version of the same fix.  I used the version from
> Linus' tree.

Yup, that's right.  The commit in my devicetree-next branch is stale
and has been superseeded.  I just hadn't pushed out the new tree yet.
I'm refresh it today.

Cheers,
g.

> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
> http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
>



-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree
@ 2010-06-07  2:53 Stephen Rothwell
  2010-06-07 17:03 ` Grant Likely
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-06-07  2:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Grant Likely; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 564 bytes --]

Hi Grant,

Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in
drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c between commit
1f23b2d98c11fed43c552a5dbd00c793f81a8736 ("usb: fix ehci_hcd build
failure when both generic-OF and xilinx is selected") from the  tree and
commit 4c018c4ab1edd8f4154848868960ebe132c3d138 ("usb/of: fix build
errors") from the devicetree tree.

They look like two version of the same fix.  I used the version from
Linus' tree.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-16  3:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-15  3:21 linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-16  3:42 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14 23:41 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-12  2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-16  1:25 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-24  3:02 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-24 19:31 ` Rob Herring
2019-06-24  5:51 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08 23:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-14  3:02 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-06  3:01 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-06  2:55 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-05  2:13 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-16  1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-16  4:27 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-07  2:53 Stephen Rothwell
2010-06-07 17:03 ` Grant Likely

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).