From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E52C2D0A3 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:35:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DFC208C3 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:35:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731175AbgKPUfR (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:35:17 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56778 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726426AbgKPUfR (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:35:17 -0500 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 716A420782; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:35:14 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree Message-ID: <20201116153514.6e4b2c6e@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20201116132929.7f59943e@lwn.net> References: <20201116173502.392a769c@canb.auug.org.au> <20201116124338.76a522e1@gandalf.local.home> <20201116122432.796af13b@lwn.net> <20201116152552.11572354@gandalf.local.home> <20201116132929.7f59943e@lwn.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:29:29 -0700 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > Would something like the below work? I think I fixed the other places with > > issues and for consistency, replaced the ".. code-block:: c" with just "::" > > usage throughout the file. > > That will work. It will also have the effect of removing C syntax > highlighting from the formatted output; that is fine with me, but others > are more attached to it. Is there a way to set a default highlighting to be C syntax? Otherwise I'll just put it back and add the code-block statements back in, even though there are those that will complain about the added mark up ;-) -- Steve