From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C32C4361B for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 21:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BED230FD for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 21:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727040AbgLFVkE (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Dec 2020 16:40:04 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54210 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725977AbgLFVkD (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Dec 2020 16:40:03 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D652C0613D0; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 13:39:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Cq0Fj12T7z9s0b; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 08:39:21 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1607290761; bh=Rs0BgyK6iRiZjCnwfVYB84MTWnPpL5Ji5eHc2PDiwPc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cC1UEFIxUiddNISxIePHxsHDG+dGibvSyddR5FnTt3kDaax6OZj7KvVFwTlSMA16i E12kPlZLb7yz9czL15i91iHakrI7NRKCMA45UQcHa+PZr7v75eqdLXNHtTgwPz4yDZ nvLfQZ7YF7pJ4RvaSSBdoGzAUSeuXoaSm+fvWN9yRRqDt+oI6ZHU7mrS0b6MnfsKLk H79i6jTD8/FVof3dAReVZn8jwYDtXALby2xMEqWZiOuBT2KVj/pMXAHDMX5pNxtGgK EsoJNaalsyDBIbsQjmSPX1lvYvXKIEXh573GS5ShzHl23LXSF8j8SEToXg3VwYsRGY +nXIt02Ia6BqA== Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 08:39:20 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree Message-ID: <20201207083920.2f64f4dc@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20201204192032.GA1437@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> References: <20201204192526.0b38fb02@canb.auug.org.au> <20201204192032.GA1437@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/+w=skvRSarInYA9c=UDkO/4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/+w=skvRSarInYA9c=UDkO/4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Paul, On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:20:32 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" w= rote: > > Does the following patch fix things? (Sigh. It won't apply on the > rcu/next that you used. Or even on this moment's dev branch. I will > fold it in with attribution and update. But just to show you what my > thought is.) Sorry I didn't get the chance to test your patch, but it seems to make sense. I notice that you have added this to the rcu tree for today, so I guess we will see :-) --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/+w=skvRSarInYA9c=UDkO/4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAl/NT4gACgkQAVBC80lX 0Gxm1Qf/a/YWDMvY0CAnpbunpBiJZdnkFToLgQxMGbcQrqzN+nIEbxjNm9W5Bqzd 2dF4oj3GjilQkDxLphqw4bLFYzkbGb/NCJiTPoRFlDDVKZNNNunxK5EPOQO4ZpVH uod7wnjLm9fxUaeFZNz3n1LTBs74nzJU91vbjz8f2kFSGXe5KDjuDdBOBJAElOc8 nqGN9Beao0N+UQvUVTp0CTNdrFNPat72S3WT8UvlT8aJXaVuiCSL0USLmsE5beqH jmhDGZm6PiiwqBZfztjEBeao8VMIfdC0eJ7bjRdXQVWDaDGhDXMpjHaZBn7gBbUg fyhbRdtiaokLZ6xP1cS5yPMsfa/sKQ== =u58/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/+w=skvRSarInYA9c=UDkO/4--