From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C58C433DB for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A75622C7E for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404194AbhALAZ6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:25:58 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60068 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390862AbhAKXBm (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:01:42 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C79022D07; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 23:01:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1610406062; bh=I/4RwbjWZnuMYBPiKSGPL8wDUJk78ytV9lAu4l0BlrU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=JOHl5/0XBhoSKjRK5haenGZqi1VA0aIKK67vtTCvD5SnFHAchX4CbOQGT6pSkMOMm rh7fJ0cjrl2MF04TALwrqnEIR92/66k3lsinSZVZy6kEMIumuFMb2+HJ8k04JD4J3D PLBAoHzksJZ7pbDBWrcGLsGSLNVlIvE/kANfk0lcnSHSlT6YXAnV1StUVSKR+tPulh +OBky6GYmaPF8OJYvzw/NTNY/vVmj0h6ddYJd98Diz5KMOBQcTod2EgGKoAiYse6Jv JkcFxkaR1Y0kXY4YeBKZiQiSRwr33LOKLUdttxNhL1cF69fiEotVkrJf7ibC9uHbEy UUYXcPHOUqZIg== Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 23:00:29 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Pratyush Yadav Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , Andy Whitcroft , Joe Perches Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the spi tree Message-ID: <20210111230029.GM4728@sirena.org.uk> References: <20210112073606.7cb02e42@canb.auug.org.au> <20210111205810.tipt54yk2dljim3l@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OQhbRXNHSL5w/5po" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210111205810.tipt54yk2dljim3l@ti.com> X-Cookie: Too much is not enough. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org --OQhbRXNHSL5w/5po Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 02:28:12AM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > I meant this one. My mistake. Copied the wrong hash. Any way to fix this= =20 > now? Not without rebasing which I generally avoid. --OQhbRXNHSL5w/5po Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl/82IwACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Dkiwf9Ganq2ycGq/TtFtz6E7gQ2GC79poZgIRvzqchNSwjoN/8Riuw3dBwpqh7 Gv1kpIACfd3OXEQTHegz5Aokgd8gcgJQjBbfXd43F+KSq8DAQsCMe8y8eei8+08O 6icjOZIBVNlnAu7NNcKbi8v4rEfoagEZxCGnP7zIdgQquiO3YYJLfyyr+Jx1ojMh ReKwPtMp+bpynBTY2jraQPLLkDXM2BR3zLD7TY4eX1M52GzKmDHha1YSFjMPFu9F /MhTKcZp2eYkdMygCEWGZgUF8gZBlPJPsFUgRCmdpX6kcU4tf7aZEFxrLIC/giyN IwEjp6Khadv9kG1zzKlDYgSdexuDbQ== =GPCn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OQhbRXNHSL5w/5po--