linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the net-next tree
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 07:53:21 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210215075321.0f3ea0de@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210121132645.0a9edc15@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1563 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:26:45 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   19d9a846d9fc ("dt-binding: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: update bindings for am64x cpsw3g")
> 
> from the net-next tree and commit:
> 
>   0499220d6dad ("dt-bindings: Add missing array size constraints")
> 
> from the devicetree tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> index 3fae9a5f0c6a,097c5cc6c853..000000000000
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> @@@ -72,7 -66,8 +72,8 @@@ properties
>     dma-coherent: true
>   
>     clocks:
> +     maxItems: 1
>  -    description: CPSW2G NUSS functional clock
>  +    description: CPSWxG NUSS functional clock
>   
>     clock-names:
>       items:

With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
conflict still exists.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-14 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-21  2:26 linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the net-next tree Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-14 20:53 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2021-02-22  8:23   ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-22 10:35     ` Grygorii Strashko
2021-02-22 21:12       ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-08-29  1:50 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-15  5:28 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-28  4:56 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09  0:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-30  4:37 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-15  3:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-23  3:37 Stephen Rothwell
2014-02-14  3:16 Stephen Rothwell
2014-02-14  3:47 ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210215075321.0f3ea0de@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).