Hi all, On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:16:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:57:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > > > block/bio.c: In function 'bio_add_zone_append_page': > > block/bio.c:860:31: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_disk' > > 860 | struct request_queue *q = bio->bi_disk->queue; > > | ^~ > > > > Caused by commit > > > > 309dca309fc3 ("block: store a block_device pointer in struct bio") > > > > interacting with commit > > > > 9f678097f3de ("block: add bio_add_zone_append_page") Now ae29333fa644 ("block: add bio_add_zone_append_page") > > > > from the btrfs tree. > > > > I applied the following merge fix up for today. > > > > From: Stephen Rothwell > > Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:54:29 +1100 > > Subject: [PATCH] block: bio: fix up for bi_disk removal > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell > > --- > > block/bio.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c > > index bf3ab1b5c844..e3b9d3e0a196 100644 > > --- a/block/bio.c > > +++ b/block/bio.c > > @@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_add_pc_page); > > int bio_add_zone_append_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page, > > unsigned int len, unsigned int offset) > > { > > - struct request_queue *q = bio->bi_disk->queue; > > + struct request_queue *q = bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk->queue; > > bool same_page = false; > > > > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bio_op(bio) != REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND)) > > -- > > 2.29.2 > > This then lead to the following in my x86_64 allmodconfig build: > > fs/btrfs/zoned.c: In function 'btrfs_record_physical_zoned': > fs/btrfs/zoned.c:1286:21: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_disk' > 1286 | ordered->disk = bio->bi_disk; > | ^~ > fs/btrfs/zoned.c:1287:23: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_partno' > 1287 | ordered->partno = bio->bi_partno; > | ^~ > > Do to the above block tree commit interacting with commit > > bccc13e5fe0c ("btrfs: use ZONE_APPEND write for ZONED btrfs") Now d8e3fb106f39 ("btrfs: zoned: use ZONE_APPEND write for zoned mode") > > from the btrfs tree. > > For which I applied the following merge fix patch: > > From: Stephen Rothwell > Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:08:44 +1100 > Subject: [PATCH] block: btrfs: another fix up for bi_disk removal > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell > --- > fs/btrfs/zoned.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c > index 334a54be587d..4829ffc5275b 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c > @@ -1283,8 +1283,8 @@ void btrfs_record_physical_zoned(struct inode *inode, u64 file_offset, > return; > > ordered->physical = physical; > - ordered->disk = bio->bi_disk; > - ordered->partno = bio->bi_partno; > + ordered->disk = bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk; > + ordered->partno = bio->bi_bdev->bd_partno; > > btrfs_put_ordered_extent(ordered); > } > -- > 2.29.2 With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this conflict still exists. I am still applying both these merge fix ups. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell