Hi all,

On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 07:53:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:26:45 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   19d9a846d9fc ("dt-binding: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: update bindings for am64x cpsw3g")
> > 
> > from the net-next tree and commit:
> > 
> >   0499220d6dad ("dt-bindings: Add missing array size constraints")
> > 
> > from the devicetree tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> > 
> > diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> > index 3fae9a5f0c6a,097c5cc6c853..000000000000
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> > @@@ -72,7 -66,8 +72,8 @@@ properties
> >     dma-coherent: true
> >   
> >     clocks:
> > +     maxItems: 1
> >  -    description: CPSW2G NUSS functional clock
> >  +    description: CPSWxG NUSS functional clock
> >   
> >     clock-names:
> >       items:  
> 
> With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
> conflict still exists.

This is now a conflict between the devicetree tree and Linus' tree.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell