From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAACC433ED for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 14:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507D361166 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 14:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242887AbhDPO7C (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 10:59:02 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50070 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240740AbhDPO7B (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 10:59:01 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 772A0C061756; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 07:58:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FMK8n1kfXz9sWK; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 00:58:33 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1618585113; bh=cIlMdrmnY8xfUotlk3HjA+3AaMQAPaEqG0+WRFRFMzY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Lxvk3EsayIuu49a14DRd3ArX/Xa2jMszBu/PeFy9V2YOI6MLPDfnKZ/wroYFEkjoZ ruxhG+2jOinHLzd1gZpuvf1pg2+h5snEDcnSAWz9r86PiZRARRaWqAh1TGBCupm7Ei zX8a9vsnM2AaNGbh+lvjv1boh2ii0vXB3vscwAwI7559JbVazl6Gu1NSl6MxR0h7R4 UEvaiJ/l2Ya4xKXXdyeTaktjI42a+TvRpbOF3FC4JiaCqs9gmE7jgNI2qZikWe5HRG rZk1ITj2w4mNFHMXODhTw6fB/czUTuAJOhqikDpK9xXexgsHkgqmsUh6bK6pkNbbVE 6aPRK8udIi5vg== Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 00:58:31 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Christian Borntraeger , KVM , Claudio Imbrenda , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the kvm tree Message-ID: <20210417005831.3785688b@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <2b825142-fdd9-be35-6d88-bb3b9c985122@redhat.com> References: <20210416222731.3e82b3a0@canb.auug.org.au> <00222197-fb22-ab0a-97e2-11c9f85a67f1@de.ibm.com> <2b825142-fdd9-be35-6d88-bb3b9c985122@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/0DmwpD/swBEIc1UY/TlK=+X"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/0DmwpD/swBEIc1UY/TlK=+X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 16:02:01 +0200 Paolo Bonzini wrot= e: > > On 16/04/21 14:38, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > On 16.04.21 14:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: =20 > >> Hi all, > >> > >> In commit > >> > >> =C2=A0=C2=A0 c3171e94cc1c ("KVM: s390: VSIE: fix MVPG handling for pre= fixing and >> MSO") > >> > >> Fixes tag > >> > >> =C2=A0=C2=A0 Fixes: bdf7509bbefa ("s390/kvm: VSIE: correctly handle MV= PG when in >> VSIE") > >> > >> has these problem(s): > >> > >> =C2=A0=C2=A0 - Subject does not match target commit subject > >> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Just use > >> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0git log -1 --format=3D'Fixes: %h ("%s")' =20 > >=20 > > Hmm, this has been sitting in kvms390/next for some time now. Is this a= > new check? > > =20 >=20 > Maybe you just missed it when it was reported for kvms390? >=20 > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-next/msg59652.html It was a different commit SHA then and was reported because the Fixes SHA did not exist. It was fixed the next day, so I guess either I missed reporting this different problem, or I thought at least it had been fixed to use the correct SHA. I am not completely consistent, sometimes :-) --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/0DmwpD/swBEIc1UY/TlK=+X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmB5phcACgkQAVBC80lX 0GwoqggAhj7E4OiKMOnBWhl1ZjaMdZAidgXea6JGZGTB3UEhRtJVCMk3zjqfN6N5 BHE3GS3zfIlipzavzSDc/Qu0Vy/CqTndlYVZB+RzJszegcwTVu9Z1Cv9f+gHARjz QGhwHSMcJncqzICp/3fyPQvbmruZr8e3ah7iWucCOfgWj6vri5A/jDjSjIR1UKoN kbf38gi14BGsULsASiSEMREo2bksWBkhea0mQ8qzd/FFQgc/IS1kInazRNfxzH6k hGzdVc+Np9e1W3Q0LIzWiENnFiFL+hyWKkQZs+W6pk/g68jaKt4X6CG/+weKOzsv Ld0tGk7SIU3DhXdxstZPgnph3UiyDA== =5y7J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/0DmwpD/swBEIc1UY/TlK=+X--