From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7950C49EA6 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 22:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B527F613AD for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 22:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232917AbhFXWno (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:43:44 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:39751 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232913AbhFXWnm (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:43:42 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4G9w8q4svlz9sV8; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 08:41:15 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1624574477; bh=Dzv52F0SnnFNYtb+bHVaVYmqTSKv7JgbUkh4dGMK1G4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rljYfYqLBYPqi3yaoU8df5DSATRX2yaxSAUCltw/4bX3jJuERSFCSYH885HrGPNQ4 Tah0CKLhvnev+bEVMgMZueWnrsD0iQLv8OnB9oAal+7BGQgt8ITE+2m8AA9wu51aJJ K94xkURch6Ioy2MycJEj/6ZO5X+FrkRotl3yNJT3EnQ5BFsAvwyZaDfg0d8XK/d/uT Dj3o10RhlnFYb067vVNhDrenyhCgNl40Oa5NJbAZ+hq1e/h4jOKgt8HYl83aiETzPy Y6Qn5AwRslPHjKoycanOO4TQTZLTEHrAEU43EOzIjn84nu0VamSey4Rw3eyHFTT1xh hUTuXIQC6WVMg== Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 08:41:14 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Marcin Wojtas Cc: Naresh Kamboju , David Miller , Networking , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , Nathan Chancellor , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree Message-ID: <20210625084114.4126dd02@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20210624082911.5d013e8c@canb.auug.org.au> <20210624185430.692d4b60@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/fsjcmTTZ98dxqF2S9vcrms2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/fsjcmTTZ98dxqF2S9vcrms2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Marcin, On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 16:25:57 +0200 Marcin Wojtas wrote: > > Just to understand correctly - you reverted merge from the local > branch (I still see the commits on Dave M's net-next/master). I see a Yes, I reverted the merge in linux-next only. > quick solution, but I'm wondering how I should proceed. Submit a > correction patch to the mailing lists against the net-next? Or the > branch is going to be reverted and I should resubmit everything as v4? I see others have answered this. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/fsjcmTTZ98dxqF2S9vcrms2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmDVCgoACgkQAVBC80lX 0GzmWwf/fr8EWOF5GQYVveJX5NrFqj8EcNIrHX9mXjVZPvXEWqQiyvnDEBXxkzmf 9B+CQIKIyMkAnJOS3P3jJVteoy2+9SzTzEbHtYDp2yelazNDNG80Oe5H0UwZ7nYU mY+ba2x6vs88YoO8NB24WnIV56zul+tEo3SJH8bwdCg7ayX5HwpvjCHu+XEqf3Dw cUErzauWomCu5lBSBfifO5tpr7+Zl2T/1xVRSSVBr70KlwigvCKIqy5oSMR5YY7R f5cB9/H0Zemr2qj7zRjUUEPYjlOzksM5tTbl4PB0EUw5QJevCed/q5vVTb3cVUQn XaMJ79suCXHMJLIso5B/pgazhPL8nQ== =yG3T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/fsjcmTTZ98dxqF2S9vcrms2--