linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjarni Jonasson <bjarni.jonasson@microchip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 09:04:19 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210723090419.529ee5ef@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210720141101.78c1b8ba@cakuba>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1994 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:11:01 +0200 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:45:31 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 09:50:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:  
> > >
> > > While compiling Linus' tree, a powerpc-allmodconfig build (and others)
> > > with gcc 4.9 failed like this:
> > > 
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_netdev.c: In function 'ifh_encode_bitfield':
> > > include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_431' declared with attribute error: Unsupported width, must be <= 40
> > >   _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> > >                                       ^
> > > include/linux/compiler_types.h:309:4: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
> > >     prefix ## suffix();    \
> > >     ^
> > > include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:2: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
> > >   _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> > >   ^
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_netdev.c:28:2: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
> > >   compiletime_assert(width <= 40, "Unsupported width, must be <= 40");
> > >   ^
> > > 
> > > Caused by commit
> > > 
> > >   f3cad2611a77 ("net: sparx5: add hostmode with phylink support")
> > > 
> > > I guess this is caused by the call to ifh_encode_bitfield() not being
> > > inlined.    
> > 
> > I am still getting these failures.  
> 
> Bjarni, Steen, could you address this build failure ASAP?
> 
> We can't have a compile time asserts in static functions, if the code
> is optimized for size chances are the function won't get inlined. clang
> is pretty bad at propagating constants to compile time asserts, too.
> Please remove this check, or refactor it to be done in a macro, or ..

I am still getting these failures.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-22 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-14 23:50 linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2021-07-20  6:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-07-20 12:11   ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-07-22 23:04     ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-27 22:01 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-27 22:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-27 22:31   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-27 23:33   ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-11-05  4:54 Stephen Rothwell
2021-11-05  9:25 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-11-05  4:49 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-07  1:02 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-06  5:57 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-23  7:40 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-23 23:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-11-24  0:23   ` Daniel Axtens
2020-11-25  2:47     ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-21  2:05 Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-20 11:46 linux-next: build failure in Linus tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-28  8:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-18 22:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-05  1:22 linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-05  1:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-02-09 21:08 Stephen Rothwell
2020-02-09 21:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-09 22:57   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-09 23:48     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-10  2:00     ` Zenghui Yu
2018-10-28 22:45 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-28 22:35 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-28 22:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-10-29  1:38   ` Hangbin Liu
2018-10-29  2:17   ` David Miller
2018-06-12  2:26 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-18  3:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-04 22:28 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-17 23:34 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-27  6:06 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-28 20:44 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-11-03  4:09 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-03  4:16 ` David Miller
2012-07-27  0:15 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-27  0:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-27  1:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-14  1:47 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-14  3:06 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-14  3:40   ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-15  0:14     ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-15  0:56       ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-17 23:38         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-06-18  4:58           ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-15  9:23       ` Sedat Dilek
2012-06-15 10:15         ` Sedat Dilek
2012-06-15  8:46     ` Richard W.M. Jones
2012-06-15 11:38     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-14  0:50 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-14  6:57 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-14  8:32   ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-07  0:08 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-07  0:10 ` Al Viro
2012-04-19  0:41 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-24  0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-29  0:44 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-29 22:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-29 22:50   ` James Bottomley
2011-08-11  1:59 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-11  6:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-05-26  1:12 Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-20  1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-20  1:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-17 23:29 Stephen Rothwell
2011-03-17 23:35 ` Luck, Tony
2011-01-14 23:40 Stephen Rothwell
2011-01-19  3:12 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-19  4:19   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-01-13 23:43 Stephen Rothwell
2011-01-14  1:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-14  2:17   ` Al Viro
2010-12-21  1:01 Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-21  4:47 ` Sedat Dilek
2010-10-06  0:09 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-28  0:57 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-28  1:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-30  0:43   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-06-01 17:04     ` Tony Luck
2010-06-01 17:07       ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-24  0:40 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210723090419.529ee5ef@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=bjarni.jonasson@microchip.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars.povlsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).