linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:50:50 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210826115050.7612b9cc@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 943 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:717:47: error: expected ')' before 'struct'
  717 | BTF_ID_LIST_GLOBAL_SINGLE(btf_task_struct_ids, struct, task_struct)
      |                                               ^~~~~~~
      |                                               )
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function 'bpf_tracing_func_proto':
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1051:11: error: 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'bpf_get_current_task_proto'?
 1051 |   return &bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto;
      |           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |           bpf_get_current_task_proto

Caused by commit

  33c5cb36015a ("bpf: Consolidate task_struct BTF_ID declarations")

I have used the bpf-next tree from next-20210825 for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2021-08-26  1:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-26  1:50 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2021-08-26  2:01 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree Daniel Xu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-03-19 23:26 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-20 12:07 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-03-21 22:35   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-20  1:59 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-20  3:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-07-20  3:44   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-04-19  1:56 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-21  0:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-21  9:45   ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-04-21 10:40     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2022-02-09  0:21 Stephen Rothwell
2021-12-03  0:15 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-14  1:37 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-14 23:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-09-14 23:38   ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-14 23:40     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-09-14 23:59       ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-15  1:27         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-03-11  0:47 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-11  6:47 ` Björn Töpel
2021-03-12  1:00   ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-26  1:18     ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-01  8:07 Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-01 14:55 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-09-08  3:08 Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08 17:54 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-08-21  1:11 Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-25  1:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-25  1:25   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-08-25  3:04     ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-25  3:27       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-08-25  6:50         ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-25 14:33           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-08-25 21:10             ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-25 22:34               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-08-25 23:09                 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-14  2:22 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-14  6:16 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-07-14  8:31   ` Jiri Olsa
2020-07-14  9:19     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-07-01  4:57 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-01  5:01 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-18  1:57 Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-28  1:31 Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-28  2:18 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-10-03  3:18 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-03  5:29 ` Joe Stringer
2018-09-07  0:19 Stephen Rothwell
2018-09-07  0:22 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-09-07  5:21   ` Björn Töpel
2018-09-07  5:45     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-12-13  1:32 Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-13  1:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210826115050.7612b9cc@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).