Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 16

[Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1473 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 18:43:37 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On September 16, 2021 2:30:04 PM GMT-03:00, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 11:11 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:  
> >>
> >> Changes since 20210915:
> >>
> >> The bpf-next tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
> >> next-20210913.  
> >
> >Arnaldo,
> >
> >could you please push Andrii's fix into your tree asap
> >and then cleanup/follow up with a better fix if  necessary?  
> 
> It's there since yesterday:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=00e0ca3721cf2ddcb38cf676a3de61933640d31d
> 
> Replying just now since it's a holiday here and I was AFK.

But that is not in any tree that is included in linux-next (and when it
does appear, it will be in the tip tree which gets merged well after
the bpf-next tree).  I will include that patch as a merge fix up for
the bpf-next tree until that patch has gone into Linus' tree ... so,
someone has to ensure that this patch get into Linus tree *before* the
bpf-next tree.

So, do you see the problem?  Linus' tree is fine on its own.  The
bpf-next tree has a patch that breaks Linus' tree, but the breakage is
not seen in the bpf-next tree because it is base on v5.14 and the
interacting patch is in v5.15-rc1.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]