From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899BFC433FE for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 13:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA4061139 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 13:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230308AbhJ1NRG (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:17:06 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34810 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230305AbhJ1NRG (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:17:06 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB8FA60F0F; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 13:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:14:37 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , Michael Wang Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with Linus' tree Message-ID: <20211028091437.7a3d0838@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20211028163111.7f09f7eb@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20211028163111.7f09f7eb@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:31:11 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the ftrace tree got conflicts in: > > include/linux/trace_recursion.h > kernel/trace/ftrace.c Yeah, this is one of the times I will be sending Linus a link to the merge of his tree in my repo for my pull request. I have this ready. > @@@ -162,12 -192,22 +165,18 @@@ > current->trace_recursion = val; > barrier(); > > + preempt_disable_notrace(); > + The only difference between what I have and yours, is that I nuked the extra space ;-) Thanks, -- Steve > - return bit + 1; > + return bit; > } >