Hi all, On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 18:27:53 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the char-misc tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c > > between commit: > > 5740211ea442 ("drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build") > > from the drm-intel tree and commit: > > 16b0314aa746 ("dma-buf: move dma-buf symbols into the DMA_BUF module namespace") > > from the char-misc tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell > > diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c > index a45d0ec2c5b6,abb854281347..000000000000 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c > @@@ -12,13 -13,8 +13,15 @@@ > #include "i915_gem_object.h" > #include "i915_scatterlist.h" > > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86) > +#include > +#else > +#define wbinvd_on_all_cpus() \ > + pr_warn(DRIVER_NAME ": Missing cache flush in %s\n", __func__) > +#endif > + > + MODULE_IMPORT_NS(DMA_BUF); > + > I915_SELFTEST_DECLARE(static bool force_different_devices;) > > static struct drm_i915_gem_object *dma_buf_to_obj(struct dma_buf *buf) This is now a conflict between the drm-intel tree and Linux' tree. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell