Hi Stephen,

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:33:53AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   f927767978d2 ("drm/vc4: kms: Fix return code check")
>   d354699e2292 ("drm/vc4: kms: Don't duplicate pending commit")
> 
> from the drm-misc-fixes tree and commit:
> 
>   16e101051f32 ("drm/vc4: Increase the core clock based on HVS load")
> 
> from the drm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Unfortunately the merge resolution isn't entirely correct :/

There's multiple conflicts between those two branches on that file, but
things went wrong between 16e101051f32 and 0c980a006d3f

The first one changes the logic a bit for the clk_set_min_rate argument,
and the second moves the clk_set_min_rate around.

However, the merge resolution reintroduced the initial clk_set_min_rate
call line (line 373), without changing the logic of the proper call site
(line 396).

This is the patch to fix the resolution:

-- >8 --
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c	2021-11-30 08:56:28.748524275 +0100
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c	2021-11-29 15:46:11.692151678 +0100
@@ -365,14 +365,6 @@
 		vc4_hvs_mask_underrun(dev, vc4_crtc_state->assigned_channel);
 	}

-	if (vc4->hvs->hvs5) {
-		unsigned long core_rate = max_t(unsigned long,
-						500000000,
-						new_hvs_state->core_clock_rate);
-
-		clk_set_min_rate(hvs->core_clk, core_rate);
-	}
-
 	for (channel = 0; channel < HVS_NUM_CHANNELS; channel++) {
 		struct drm_crtc_commit *commit;
 		int ret;
@@ -392,8 +384,13 @@
 		old_hvs_state->fifo_state[channel].pending_commit = NULL;
 	}

-	if (vc4->hvs->hvs5)
-		clk_set_min_rate(hvs->core_clk, 500000000);
+	if (vc4->hvs->hvs5) {
+		unsigned long core_rate = max_t(unsigned long,
+						500000000,
+						new_hvs_state->core_clock_rate);
+
+		clk_set_min_rate(hvs->core_clk, core_rate);
+	}

 	drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_disables(dev, state);
-- >8 --

I'm wondering though, do you have access to the drm-rerere tree? I've
fixed up the merge yesterday to deal with this conflict and the conflict
resolution should be stored there already.

Maxime