linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 09:39:26 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220125093926.4fb47c1d@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 795 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c

between commit:

  cca084692394 ("drm/i915: Use per device iommu check")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  8172375ea95a ("drm/i915: Remove zombie async flip vt-d w/a")

from the drm-intel tree.

I fixed it up (the latter removed the code modified by the former, so
I just did that) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.



-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2022-01-25  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-24 22:39 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-09  0:22 linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-22  0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-22  1:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-06 23:09 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-13 23:23 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-14  8:19 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-14 10:10   ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-14 10:35     ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-14 11:02       ` Jani Nikula
2022-10-17 22:05 Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-07 23:59 Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-07 23:53 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-05  1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-05  0:53 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-24 22:33 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-02 15:29 Mark Brown
2021-05-20  0:19 Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-21  1:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-12  0:28 Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08  4:00 Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08  8:22 ` Hans de Goede
2020-09-08 11:04   ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08 13:20     ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-23  1:35 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-22  2:21 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-23  0:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-19  1:42 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-16  0:38 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-08  2:08 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-31  1:06 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-31  1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-22  1:03 Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-19  0:23 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-29  1:20 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-29  1:20 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-17  0:13 Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-09  1:02 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-29  1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-08  4:32 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-18  2:50 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-13  0:58 Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-18  1:25 Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-18  1:20 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-26  3:54 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17  3:32 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17  3:25 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21  1:58 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-07  1:27 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-07  8:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-05-08  0:11   ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-03  2:43 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-03  8:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-02  2:46 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-04 23:23 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220125093926.4fb47c1d@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).