Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kspp tree

[Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5402 bytes --]

Hi all,

[Cc'ing the scsi maintainers.  Sorry I should have done that sooner]

On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:43:44 -0800 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 02:24:30PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > 
> > drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c: In function 'ibmvscsis_send_messages':
> > drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1934:44: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
> >  1934 |                                         crq->valid = VALID_CMD_RESP_EL;
> >       |                                            ^~
> > drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'
> >  1875 |         u64 msg_hi = 0;
> >       |             ^~~~~~
> > drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1935:44: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
> >  1935 |                                         crq->format = cmd->rsp.format;
> >       |                                            ^~
> > drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'
> >  1875 |         u64 msg_hi = 0;
> >       |             ^~~~~~
> > drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1938:52: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
> >  1938 |                                                 crq->status = VIOSRP_ADAPTER_FAIL;
> >       |                                                    ^~
> > drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'
> >  1875 |         u64 msg_hi = 0;
> >       |             ^~~~~~
> > drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1940:44: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
> >  1940 |                                         crq->IU_length = cpu_to_be16(cmd->rsp.len);
> >       |                                            ^~
> > drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'
> >  1875 |         u64 msg_hi = 0;
> >       |             ^~~~~~
> > 
> > Exposed by commit
> > 
> >   4ba545781e20 ("Makefile: Enable -Warray-bounds")
> > 
> > Probably introduced by commit
> > 
> >   88a678bbc34c ("ibmvscsis: Initial commit of IBM VSCSI Tgt Driver")
> > 
> > I applied the following hack for now:
> > 
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:18:36 +1100
> > Subject: [PATCH] scsi: hack for building with -Warray-bounds
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c
> > index 61f06f6885a5..89fcf98c61c3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c
> > @@ -1872,11 +1872,11 @@ static void srp_snd_msg_failed(struct scsi_info *vscsi, long rc)
> >   */
> >  static void ibmvscsis_send_messages(struct scsi_info *vscsi)
> >  {
> > -	u64 msg_hi = 0;
> > +	u64 msg_hi[2] = { };
> >  	/* note do not attempt to access the IU_data_ptr with this pointer
> >  	 * it is not valid
> >  	 */
> > -	struct viosrp_crq *crq = (struct viosrp_crq *)&msg_hi;
> > +	struct viosrp_crq *crq = (struct viosrp_crq *)msg_hi;
> >  	struct ibmvscsis_cmd *cmd, *nxt;
> >  	long rc = ADAPT_SUCCESS;
> >  	bool retry = false;
> > @@ -1940,7 +1940,7 @@ static void ibmvscsis_send_messages(struct scsi_info *vscsi)
> >  					crq->IU_length = cpu_to_be16(cmd->rsp.len);
> >  
> >  					rc = h_send_crq(vscsi->dma_dev->unit_address,
> > -							be64_to_cpu(msg_hi),
> > +							be64_to_cpu(msg_hi[0]),
> >  							be64_to_cpu(cmd->rsp.tag));
> >  
> >  					dev_dbg(&vscsi->dev, "send_messages: cmd %p, tag 0x%llx, rc %ld\n",  
> 
> This looks correct to me. struct viosrp_crq is 16 bytes wide. The only
> suggestion I might make would be either avoid the bare '2':
> 
> 	u64 msg_hi[sizeof(struct viosrp_crq) / sizeof(u64)] = { };
> 
> or adjust struct viosrp_crq so the casting isn't needed at all:
> 
> 
> truct viosrp_crq {
> 	union {
> 		u64 hi;
> 		struct {
> 		        u8 valid;               /* used by RPA */
> 		        u8 format;              /* SCSI vs out-of-band */
> 		        u8 reserved;
> 		        u8 status;              /* non-scsi failure? (e.g. DMA failure) */
> 		        __be16 timeout;         /* in seconds */
> 		        __be16 IU_length;       /* in bytes */
> 		};
> 	};
>         __be64 IU_data_ptr;     /* the TCE for transferring data */
> };
> 
> 	struct viosrp_crq crq = { };
> 	...
>  			rc = h_send_crq(vscsi->dma_dev->unit_address,
> 					be64_to_cpu(crq.hi),
> 					be64_to_cpu(cmd->rsp.tag));
> 
> 
> 

Has there been any progress on this?

Commit 88a678bbc34c mentioned above was merged in v4.8-rc1.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]