linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the block tree
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 07:20:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220401052009.GA9398@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220331094425.0a9e0b92@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 09:44:25AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the device-mapper tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   include/linux/bio.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   57c47b42f454 ("block: turn bio_kmalloc into a simple kmalloc wrapper")
> 
> from the block tree and commit:
> 
>   135eaaabd22a ("block: allow using the per-cpu bio cache from bio_alloc_bioset")

Isn't this something Jens already had queued up in the block tree?

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-01  5:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-30 22:44 linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the block tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-01  5:20 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-04-01 16:28   ` Mike Snitzer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-07-28  3:14 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-28  3:23 ` Ming Lei
2021-08-10  1:55 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-09  3:21 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-22  5:17 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-10  3:43 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-10  3:55 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-10  5:13   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-07-21  3:27 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-18  4:09 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-09  3:59 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-09  4:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-10 17:01   ` Mike Snitzer
2015-09-02  2:39 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-17  2:16 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-06  4:33 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-06 14:30 ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220401052009.GA9398@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).