From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720ADC433F5 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1383418AbiDUAey (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2022 20:34:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60356 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1383417AbiDUAew (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2022 20:34:52 -0400 Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE04C19001; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 17:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4KkJQ94Vv4z4xPw; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:32:01 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1650501122; bh=Hm6KZ3K5osDijgENlnBn7zUyQFG9ayBp+YN8rXKdnGQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=obn/uPWery0cOe2i78JESoY7ZrSyJ0O5qr2hxOGcBXAPjD2/hwp4qVHts2kmwCNuC RlDKGKfSrare2OXEG1RIVSPQSPgEAu6eOYQL7YCGgxV1BGNwyySj1tjpHYlRh5eKeO CF5C9oS3e7g+HpHaZIGpCxKPImyzeFlrv+T3fFVo33SFFlNSCECopCNYcLmq+MXA2B 05PjE81HKNWC+6E4yAoGoz+I/ODJvOsoMAqciu4yls0qLlCQ8vnWKJKPvAuTZ6bfog hqq/+Vil6I9hyVQ7aVSm3t3ua/PRZ/os17axsPONcayXOYje7QR5NgbhHDH/P8tEUi 4X7FMyRL5HRSw== Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:32:00 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko Cc: bpf , Networking , Maciej Fijalkowski , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree Message-ID: <20220421103200.2b4e8424@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20220419115620.65580586@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20220419115620.65580586@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/cuJo37G2y069ugpaAE+5dQs"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/cuJo37G2y069ugpaAE+5dQs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 11:56:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell = wrote: > > After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build > (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: >=20 > In file included from include/linux/compiler_types.h:73, > from : > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c: In function 'i40e_run_xdp_zc': > include/linux/compiler_attributes.h:222:41: error: attribute 'fallthrough= ' not preceding a case label or default label [-Werror] > 222 | # define fallthrough __attribute__((__fallthro= ugh__)) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c:192:17: note: in expansion of = macro 'fallthrough' > 192 | fallthrough; /* handle aborts by dropping packet = */ > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > In file included from include/linux/compiler_types.h:73, > from : > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c: In function 'ixgbe_run_xdp_= zc': > include/linux/compiler_attributes.h:222:41: error: attribute 'fallthrough= ' not preceding a case label or default label [-Werror] > 222 | # define fallthrough __attribute__((__fallthro= ugh__)) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c:147:17: note: in expansion o= f macro 'fallthrough' > 147 | fallthrough; /* handle aborts by dropping packet = */ > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors >=20 > Caused by commits >=20 > b8aef650e549 ("i40e, xsk: Terminate Rx side of NAPI when XSK Rx queue g= ets full") > c7dd09fd4628 ("ixgbe, xsk: Terminate Rx side of NAPI when XSK Rx queue = gets full") >=20 > I have used the bpf-next tree from next-20220414 for today. I am still getting these failures ... --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/cuJo37G2y069ugpaAE+5dQs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmJgpgAACgkQAVBC80lX 0GxxWAf+JnWmPn19kjBUxAdcW83uuTu2QDff0kqKvK6gO9EShxfcxLKmtyjJs+nX vULA8e3A93RvxmnzJiSql16YJraVRqfBk63TNE+hUIzWdQy9F3drBoX7BuiqqBSF 65lsmUy5mZ2z9S1dLSc4JI/rhabfUXG2Nv9fyNPfTmCl5UTzw+sLqt+SyO98IkPA 1agCoF3jv5pvQQgPpiIDzeAnWhf2oZy8VUQxNKvUav73o8+f+6R5Nrdex0yQUpix B8jbyvlyEv2SOGMfR2SGFhwUw+EkPzpJaKHyWFDpURje4WMKMTnz04F1V4mQ2F8o WWVmsPz8AovUnAWI3xbFgVKusbalLQ== =5Gxf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/cuJo37G2y069ugpaAE+5dQs--