linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: broonie@kernel.org
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the ext3 tree
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:01:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220926130137.105900-1-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:

  fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.h

between commit:

  7a80bf902d2bc ("fanotify: Remove obsoleted fanotify_event_has_path()")

from the ext3 tree and commit:

  d5bf88895f246 ("fs/notify: constify path")

from the vfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

diff --cc fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.h
index b34246c6ec87e,bf6d4d38afa04..0000000000000
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.h
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.h
@@@ -452,7 -452,13 +452,7 @@@ static inline bool fanotify_is_error_ev
  	return mask & FAN_FS_ERROR;
  }
  
- static inline struct path *fanotify_event_path(struct fanotify_event *event)
 -static inline bool fanotify_event_has_path(struct fanotify_event *event)
 -{
 -	return event->type == FANOTIFY_EVENT_TYPE_PATH ||
 -		event->type == FANOTIFY_EVENT_TYPE_PATH_PERM;
 -}
 -
+ static inline const struct path *fanotify_event_path(struct fanotify_event *event)
  {
  	if (event->type == FANOTIFY_EVENT_TYPE_PATH)
  		return &FANOTIFY_PE(event)->path;

             reply	other threads:[~2022-09-26 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-26 13:01 broonie [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-03 22:56 linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the ext3 tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-01-02  1:09 Stephen Rothwell
2018-11-27 23:10 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-01  1:56 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-01 15:32 ` Jan Kara
2018-06-11 23:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-08 22:55 Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-18  0:32 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-05  2:06 Stephen Rothwell
2011-07-18  3:36 Stephen Rothwell
2011-07-18 19:32 ` Jan Kara
2010-05-28  1:31 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220926130137.105900-1-broonie@kernel.org \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cuigaosheng1@huawei.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).