linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: broonie@kernel.org
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with the mm-stable tree
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 15:55:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230413145515.3534108-1-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the ext4 tree got a conflict in:

  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c

between commit:

  66dabbb65d673 ("mm: return an ERR_PTR from __filemap_get_folio")

from the mm-stable tree and commit:

  e999a5c5a19cf ("fs: Add FGP_WRITEBEGIN")

from the ext4 tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

diff --cc fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index 96bb56c203f49,10a2035155835..0000000000000
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@@ -467,7 -467,8 +467,7 @@@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_is_partially_up
   */
  struct folio *iomap_get_folio(struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos)
  {
- 	unsigned fgp = FGP_LOCK | FGP_WRITE | FGP_CREAT | FGP_STABLE | FGP_NOFS;
+ 	unsigned fgp = FGP_WRITEBEGIN | FGP_NOFS;
 -	struct folio *folio;
  
  	if (iter->flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT)
  		fgp |= FGP_NOWAIT;

             reply	other threads:[~2023-04-13 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-13 14:55 broonie [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-04-13 14:52 linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with the mm-stable tree broonie
2023-04-13 14:50 broonie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230413145515.3534108-1-broonie@kernel.org \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).