Hi all, On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 15:44:20 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the iommufd tree got a conflict in: > > include/linux/iommu.h > > between commits: > > 1c68cbc64fe6 ("iommu: Add IOMMU_DOMAIN_PLATFORM") > 4601cd2d7c4c ("iommu: Add ops->domain_alloc_paging()") > > from the iommu tree and commits: > > 1621aef1fbfe ("iommu: Add IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED") > 909f4abd1097 ("iommu: Add new iommu op to create domains owned by userspace") > 17dd7701a2e7 ("iommu: Pass in parent domain with user_data to domain_alloc_user op") > > from the iommufd tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell > > diff --cc include/linux/iommu.h > index b5b254e205c6,f347bf31761f..000000000000 > --- a/include/linux/iommu.h > +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h > @@@ -64,8 -66,10 +66,11 @@@ struct iommu_domain_geometry > #define __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ (1U << 3) /* DMA-API uses flush queue */ > > #define __IOMMU_DOMAIN_SVA (1U << 4) /* Shared process address space */ > +#define __IOMMU_DOMAIN_PLATFORM (1U << 5) > > + #define __IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED (1U << 5) /* User-managed address space nested > + on a stage-2 translation */ > + > #define IOMMU_DOMAIN_ALLOC_FLAGS ~__IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ > /* > * This are the possible domain-types > @@@ -94,7 -96,7 +99,8 @@@ > __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_API | \ > __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ) > #define IOMMU_DOMAIN_SVA (__IOMMU_DOMAIN_SVA) > +#define IOMMU_DOMAIN_PLATFORM (__IOMMU_DOMAIN_PLATFORM) > + #define IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED (__IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED) > > struct iommu_domain { > unsigned type; > @@@ -238,9 -327,19 +331,21 @@@ static inline int __iommu_copy_struct_f > * op is allocated in the iommu driver and freed by the caller after > * use. The information type is one of enum iommu_hw_info_type defined > * in include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h. > - * @domain_alloc: allocate iommu domain > + * @domain_alloc: allocate and return an iommu domain if success. Otherwise > + * NULL is returned. The domain is not fully initialized until > + * the caller iommu_domain_alloc() returns. > + * @domain_alloc_paging: Allocate an iommu_domain that can be used for > + * UNMANAGED, DMA, and DMA_FQ domain types. > + * @domain_alloc_user: Allocate an iommu domain corresponding to the input > + * parameters as defined in include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h. > + * Unlike @domain_alloc, it is called only by IOMMUFD and > + * must fully initialize the new domain before return. > + * Upon success, if the @user_data is valid and the @parent > + * points to a kernel-managed domain, the new domain must be > + * IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED type; otherwise, the @parent must be > + * NULL while the @user_data can be optionally provided, the > + * new domain must support __IOMMU_DOMAIN_PAGING. > + * Upon failure, ERR_PTR must be returned. > * @probe_device: Add device to iommu driver handling > * @release_device: Remove device from iommu driver handling > * @probe_finalize: Do final setup work after the device is added to an IOMMU > @@@ -275,7 -372,9 +380,10 @@@ struct iommu_ops > > /* Domain allocation and freeing by the iommu driver */ > struct iommu_domain *(*domain_alloc)(unsigned iommu_domain_type); > + struct iommu_domain *(*domain_alloc_paging)(struct device *dev); > + struct iommu_domain *(*domain_alloc_user)( > + struct device *dev, u32 flags, struct iommu_domain *parent, > + const struct iommu_user_data *user_data); > > struct iommu_device *(*probe_device)(struct device *dev); > void (*release_device)(struct device *dev); This is now a conflict between the iommu tree and Linus' tree. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell