Hi all, On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 14:48:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Just cc'ing the PowerPC guys to see if my fix is sensible. > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 13:28:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > After merging the mm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64 > > allnoconfig) failed like this: > > > > arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c:557:5: error: no previous prototype for 'pmd_move_must_withdraw' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] > > 557 | int pmd_move_must_withdraw(struct spinlock *new_pmd_ptl, > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > > > > Caused by commit > > > > c6345dfa6e3e ("Makefile.extrawarn: turn on missing-prototypes globally") > > > > I have added the following patch for today (which could be applied to > > the mm or powerpc trees): > > > > From 194805b44c11b4c0aa28bdcdc0bb0d82acef394c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Stephen Rothwell > > Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 13:08:57 +1100 > > Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: pmd_move_must_withdraw() is only needed for > > CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell > > --- > > arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c > > index be229290a6a7..3438ab72c346 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c > > @@ -542,6 +542,7 @@ void ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, > > set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, pte); > > } > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE > > /* > > * For hash translation mode, we use the deposited table to store hash slot > > * information and they are stored at PTRS_PER_PMD offset from related pmd > > @@ -563,6 +564,7 @@ int pmd_move_must_withdraw(struct spinlock *new_pmd_ptl, > > > > return true; > > } > > +#endif > > > > /* > > * Does the CPU support tlbie? > > -- > > 2.40.1 I am still carrying this patch (it should probably go into the mm tree). Is someone going to pick it up (assuming it is correct)? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell