Hi Jaegeuk,

On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:13:28 -0800 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 02/29, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   fs/f2fs/super.c
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   5fa6a97d2784 ("f2fs: introduce SEGS_TO_BLKS/BLKS_TO_SEGS for cleanup")  
> 
> fyi; I dropped the above commit in -dev.

And it seems to have come back as commit

  45809cd3bdac ("f2fs: introduce SEGS_TO_BLKS/BLKS_TO_SEGS for cleanup")

(which is fine, but the conflict has returned).

> > from the f2fs tree and commit:
> > 
> >   512383ae4910 ("f2fs: port block device access to files")
> > 
> > from the vfs-brauner tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
> > 
> > diff --cc fs/f2fs/super.c
> > index 09ffdd554f9c,09e82624eff5..000000000000
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > @@@ -4206,9 -4265,9 +4206,9 @@@ static int f2fs_scan_devices(struct f2f
> >   			} else {
> >   				FDEV(i).start_blk = FDEV(i - 1).end_blk + 1;
> >   				FDEV(i).end_blk = FDEV(i).start_blk +
> >  -					(FDEV(i).total_segments <<
> >  -					sbi->log_blocks_per_seg) - 1;
> >  +						SEGS_TO_BLKS(sbi,
> >  +						FDEV(i).total_segments) - 1;
> > - 				FDEV(i).bdev_handle = bdev_open_by_path(
> > + 				FDEV(i).bdev_file = bdev_file_open_by_path(
> >   					FDEV(i).path, mode, sbi->sb, NULL);
> >   			}
> >   		}  

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell