From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82349C001DF for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 14:57:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231229AbjHAO5B (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2023 10:57:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36412 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234075AbjHAO5A (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2023 10:57:00 -0400 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89E7212B; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 07:56:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C708A3200973; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 10:56:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap51 ([10.202.2.101]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 01 Aug 2023 10:56:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1690901814; x=1690988214; bh=m5 w/FN7NhnyKPGl0XOXnEVsMCY0ctzZc2rLRkLgXhMA=; b=JOsdkIsi/b9dWNyLQ8 X1KkXWDDH/ZnpY8Uh33eF0SRVcZBVaPVYVawQXfYeerTRMeNJ1m86GJYSSwsemaR Jq89DQ6yKa2d5ZlvdNDoimGqsfsm/MBbLGuu5srkfM9YdtVgpMNuTxvfwwXL/ypL Hfw8Yk/BqJkvvUGRDrQYw2017BymUbKwYU6CmkC4vg1t8dde7M/HFZj+e6+xAu/r nIlQstCQu4zTqjlUQqpgNhUp/u7MO8yRt+OAxR3BJCiTV6XemFQ89+pNF6VDyVGs OUwZg/wq0oTyQGUqaqUlUE5t5Mh9Pk4q2X6VskUbJuElGkpghmNL9tIR0H0b6tS/ WqJg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1690901814; x=1690988214; bh=m5w/FN7NhnyKP Gl0XOXnEVsMCY0ctzZc2rLRkLgXhMA=; b=jmu5Md0n9CSOV7Z5moH2KKyqndzH0 393L8FYxxZfDSYejFJQ36QLi2KRqptTKu6pxjC+7D/1oTastlUd0+sOl6rbvG3Wx xnotnk0kRZuJeSjC9N8hGfxKLG5E61GYdOOEcYZwqK5rmISuG+SEYydQrb7I0ACQ oMmLFDvVrN2QewFxApMmoKTqhbWvQnJLhtWIKcdh1nmt0PiTbpeSXGrzbiOrYUWK DUdlNgJeGuwOZ4XLPoL/I17vxko+aHM7maMDmGwmwLwd9E6br3FXo5Wpj/p5v42F /GZjkp6Ak2jL//x2zeDVmOiyT9wgU/5QpEXZcrfBzZ6+gfBv16WOCQqmw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedrjeeigdektdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdetrhhn ugcuuegvrhhgmhgrnhhnfdcuoegrrhhnugesrghrnhgusgdruggvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpefffefgheejtdejhfefuefggfffudehiefgffekheekffeghfdvkedthfdvjeej ffenucffohhmrghinheplhhinhgrrhhordhorhhgpdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdpghhoug gsohhlthdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhl fhhrohhmpegrrhhnugesrghrnhgusgdruggv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id CAD6EB60089; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 10:56:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-592-ga9d4a09b4b-fm-defalarms-20230725.001-ga9d4a09b Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <227327a3-399a-4a9f-a775-e9627656b5a1@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 16:56:33 +0200 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: "Naresh Kamboju" , "Bart Van Assche" Cc: "open list" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-next , "Avri Altman" , "Martin K. Petersen" , "Anders Roxell" Subject: Re: next: arm64: gcc-8-defconfig: ufshcd.c:10629:2: /builds/linux/include/linux/compiler_types.h:397:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_553' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 1, 2023, at 16:23, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 at 18:53, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> > - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20230801/testrun/18754886/suite/build/test/gcc-8-defconfig/log >> > - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20230801/testrun/18754886/suite/build/test/gcc-8-defconfig/details/ >> > - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20230801/testrun/18754886/suite/build/test/gcc-8-defconfig/history/ >> >> I can't reproduce this build error with a gcc-12 arm64 cross-compiler. How >> important is gcc-8 for the ARM community? > > You are right, > gcc-12 build pass. > gcc-8 build failed. I can also reproduce this with gcc-9.5.0 from https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/ but not with 10.5.0 or clang. I get the same results for x86 with gcc-9.5.0. See https://godbolt.org/z/GjGrW9znc for a partially reduced testcase. Arnd