From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the vfs tree Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:45:23 +0100 Message-ID: <29411.1529671523@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <20180622115346.1e9cc433@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-ID: <29410.1529671523.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Reinette Chatre Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Stephen Rothwell , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Al Viro , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org Reinette Chatre wrote: > Thomas and David, please let me know what I can do from my side to help > with this. You could try basing on Al Viro's for-next tree which has the mount API changes in it. Sorry, I was hoping that this would go in the last merge window, but I don't think Al has sufficient bandwidth available. Note that it's likely to get rebased shortly as I have some patches to apply, which given we're not at -rc2 yet, I'd like to roll into the original patches to for bisectability reasons. Also, Eric has some user_ns fixes that conflict with my procfs changes that he wants to get upstream, though Linus said no - so I'm not sure what's going to happen there. David