From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: GENERIC_GPIO considered deprecated Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:45:49 +0900 Message-ID: <2e6101ce34c3$f6449580$e2cdc080$%kim@samsung.com> References: <2c9501ce342b$1535d290$3fa177b0$%kim@samsung.com> <5162EC32.2030602@wwwdotorg.org> <201304082136.44905.arnd@arndb.de> <20130409093842.656ae3fff92d5368db5c0646@canb.auug.org.au> <20130409101035.c59edcf9fa6e40a064f7fe41@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <20130409101035.c59edcf9fa6e40a064f7fe41@canb.auug.org.au> Content-language: ko Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: 'Stephen Rothwell' , 'Alexandre Courbot' Cc: 'Arnd Bergmann' , 'Stephen Warren' , 'Olof Johansson' , 'Romain Naour' , 'linux-next' , 'Grant Likely' , 'Linus Walleij' , 'Tomasz Figa' , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?'Heiko_St=FCbner'?= , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, 'ARM kernel mailing list' List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 17:07:54 -0700 Alexandre Courbot > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:36:44 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > >> > > >> On Monday 08 April 2013, Stephen Warren wrote: > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Should do the trick, if we can make sure that your tree is > merged > > >> > >> prior to my patches. > > >> > > > > >> > > I'm not sure but I think, arm-soc tree should be merged into > mainline before others... > > >> > > > > >> > >> Can you put it into your tree for 3.10? > > >> > >> > > >> > > I did, so it should be fine. > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > You may want to discuss how to handle this dependency with the arm- > soc > > >> > maintainers (CC'd). > > >> > > >> I'm fine with putting the same branch into arm-soc as well as the > gpio tree > > >> and anything else that might need it, that tends to be the least > invasive > > >> way. > > > > > > Just a reminder: that had better be the exact same branch and that > branch > > > had better never be rebased/rewritten ... > > > > Sorry, which branch are we talking about - is it the one I published > > for -next initially? If so wouldn't it be simpler to withdraw it and > > have Grant integrate the patches in his branch? Since no one depends > > on them for now anyway... > > > > I remember rebasing it once some time ago to add Acked-bys, but it > > hasn't changed since then. > > I am talking about the branch that Arnd says should be merged into both > the arm-soc and gpio trees. > Well, AFAIK, the problem including "select GENERIC_GPIO" happened only in samsung tree so arm-soc tree is enough. If any problems, please let me know. Arnd, just note, the fix is included in my pull-request [09/10]. Thanks. - Kukjin