From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:40:21 +0200 Message-ID: <3131753.BfBrDY1I4q@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <20160715121723.0f21f148@canb.auug.org.au> <2993186.kRkeiY7GfT@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160715123253.GB2620@tetsubishi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3079897.GfdoHoGgNk"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:47131 "HELO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750772AbcGOMfj (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2016 08:35:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160715123253.GB2620@tetsubishi> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Octavian Purdila , Jarkko Nikula , Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg --nextPart3079897.GfdoHoGgNk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Friday, July 15, 2016 09:32:54 PM Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 02:19:28PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, July 15, 2016 12:28:53 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:17:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > > I fixed it up (I think, but it needs more work - see below) and can > > > > > > For a start, it generates this warning, now: > > > > > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:269:20: warning: 'i2c_acpi_add_device' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > > > static acpi_status i2c_acpi_add_device(acpi_handle handle, u32 level, > > > ^ > > > > OK, thanks for the heads-up. > > Yes, thanks! > > > > > Wolfram, what about if I exposed my "acpi-tables" branch for you to pull? > > > > You could resolve this in your tree then. > > I can pull it in, sure. For the fixup, I'd like a commitment from one of > the ACPI experts (Jarkko, Mika, Andy), though. Otherwise I'd need to > revert given that we are quite late in the cycle already. Well, I can help with that too, I suppose. Thanks, Rafael --nextPart3079897.GfdoHoGgNk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCAAGBQJXiNm6AAoJEILEb/54YlRxHdgQAKOHA5IyxHVaqcW19W04xLB/ mTsz80dCIARq06bYSAkQprpKSIB71xbVUC8/wC3fMMy9hPp3ErHAa7x7RUCbHbfY EwqoguHanqr1+iD4J6c8M4Sjri1Z/LaP5LbsG3R8ce6+84DPZMoYj6VVPHrrDRYR Scp2f+/9NoRMM6X1+i//X7fHqI5rm5mUj/DrVT5Dcc+yBEqMp7yKvCyq3RCFtOee g7sX0Q+cKTP/qWjdu6ipvQQeIA6o5hy3a9HGux0pqq9VEMK80a+DjOQHjA8BVIJh ZLnPFKctJMQMZ2+s/9aJIUGLpggMk3IDl12Ld0O5942QbgMpwMRHgbpFSLsTOA9p b4sqSMGQF+rIfSmke8NN3xT87SySVzZ7VIgU5DGvZ0iW1AhoxQrtN+Ehz98OFCG1 m5YxY0xc7aUkqGhF+lQLGsywl8kJCvKbQ8CJleiTCCCsuhsiXclcFkUMdCtmMDlP 9VYHI49Cdx4zXpzSH96p0livEJvuI41tkxTbhSnXiA9zKCYhxo8JE0sh2FK7Owmu ac5P+xLLL3GugI5eHI6XYNZMszeCRH/E4hBb/vt7SZo5zKuCeK+/jaKMFef5wiEO c4OvP/jwtfEt38wn/iKkiCZvckpes3n6XDjlgbTRHCbxlTFupjb2unJfjJv+lmPr 4JTVTr7+eikSQTon0QqL =8mzm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3079897.GfdoHoGgNk--