From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfs tree Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:49:40 -0400 Message-ID: <351E30A8-F8E2-4DD8-8AB1-52D1D397785D@fys.uio.no> References: <20100322112655.0f23c1fb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7E18) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-out2.uio.no ([129.240.10.58]:34888 "EHLO mail-out2.uio.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754461Ab0CVJt5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:49:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100322112655.0f23c1fb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" On Mar 21, 2010, at 20:26, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Trond, > > After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > net/sunrpc/xprt.c: In function 'xprt_release': > net/sunrpc/xprt.c:1045: error: implicit declaration of function > 'xprt_free_bc_request' > > Caused by commit 0d28e05a53109bb52f254d5eac25dac6e3768b04 ("SUNRPC: > Fix a > use after free bug with the NFSv4.1 backchannel"). > xprt_free_bc_request() > is only declared for CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 ... > > I have used the nfs tree from next-20100319 for today. Hi Stephen Sorry about that. I've got a fix for the above (just need to define empty inline function for the !CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 case). I'll try to upload it later today. (I am unfortunately travelling so wifi access is a bit spotty). Cheers Trond