From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Luck, Tony" Subject: RE: ia64 dies in slab code on next-20120906 Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 20:26:49 +0000 Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F1939A917@ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <000001399d36edcb-6035fc93-73cf-43df-851e-c062a48db219-000000@email.amazonses.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:25253 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932179Ab2IFU0w convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2012 16:26:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <000001399d36edcb-6035fc93-73cf-43df-851e-c062a48db219-000000@email.amazonses.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , Pekka Enberg > Huh? Is there any additional info available? Backtrace? Sorry - that's all that I got on the console. >> ip is at new_slab+0x90/0x680 > Any way to relate that to a line in the code? The instruction there is a "fetchadd8.rel r14=[r9],1", so we are doing an atomic add. r9 was computed as 32 + return value from a call to allocate_slab() So I think we are inside the inlined "inc_slabs_node()" call on line 1357 of mm/slub.c -Tony