From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the drm tree Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 11:36:07 +0200 Message-ID: <4577922.FDR3KI3HOI@avalon> References: <20171205134550.58e1f217@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from galahad.ideasonboard.com ([185.26.127.97]:47493 "EHLO galahad.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753165AbdLEJfx (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Dec 2017 04:35:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20171205134550.58e1f217@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Dave Airlie , DRI , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Fabrizio Castro , Laurent Pinchart , Biju Das , Kieran Bingham Hi Stephen, On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 04:45:50 EET Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Commits > > 36a46da90212 ("drm: rcar-du: Add R8A7743 support") > cdd907001572 ("drm: rcar-du: Add R8A7745 support") > 7912dee7775e ("drm: rcar-du: Implement system suspend/resume support") > cf05f74ef40e ("drm: rcar-du: Remove unused CRTC suspend/resume functions") > > are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer. I've sent lots of pull requests to maintainers in the past where I have picked patches signed off by the original author without any further modification and only added my Acked-by or Reviewed-by line. I thought this was an accepted practice as nobody ever complained, but I'll make sure to always include my SoB for any patch that goes through my tree in the future. I'm sorry about this, it's all my fault. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart