From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B9F4CA9EAE for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 06:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343B42053B for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 06:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="dNOT3gDU" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733296AbfJWG4F (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 02:56:05 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:41312 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727885AbfJWG4F (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 02:56:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=WgOs9pzdvdtNRCgzQWI6VcaIx+3VIwVkgD8z52aiT5g=; b=dNOT3gDUaGYOa6WU8rTLoR1cE 7yDkzHxc3jklpk9EyxqlN+oGw4L1VU0Z4CBtmDooh6tZpZkvuwPIT2+GGYMXQqkF/v49ofJvaRezD Lc+C24kvDOFNncGA2U5VbiSmgtxBWSPTeYDC9dWd545cOxviTyf0GG2+Tr5UuRRP6tr2f6gQ9jkf+ n2F1nZTHpRJvXnllmn8JZ9SAghXN0o5MJFgfc4gZlX5YkNy4rERKBqKn2Ev74wQKEKLoOHbC36b7A 0qz4jXBHrITP99kbuAtPFiTibRhs43cCPLde7X7HVYXzAY6GqdbJjV8fH7ogiSJ82jI6PVzICivVG jaCs9BLeA==; Received: from [2601:1c0:6280:3f0::9ef4] by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iNAYt-00039t-J2; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 06:56:03 +0000 Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 23 To: Geert Uytterhoeven , Mark Salyzyn Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Shaokun Zhang , Andrew Morton References: <20191023155519.2d6765d4@canb.auug.org.au> From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: <46ae49f0-dbf0-0f11-3eba-e81197efbed0@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 23:56:02 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On 10/22/19 11:44 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 8:17 AM Shaokun Zhang > wrote: >> +Cc: Mark Salyzyn >> >> There is a compiler failure on arm64 platform, as follow: >> zhangshaokun@ubuntu:~/linux-next$ make -j64 >> CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh >> CC arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.s >> In file included from ./include/linux/sysctl.h:30:0, >> from ./include/linux/umh.h:9, >> from ./include/linux/kmod.h:9, >> from ./include/linux/module.h:13, >> from ./include/linux/acpi.h:29, >> from ./include/acpi/apei.h:9, >> from ./include/acpi/ghes.h:5, >> from ./include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8, >> from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10: >> ./include/uapi/linux/sysctl.h:561:29: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘}’ before ‘__attribute__’ >> NET_IPV6_TEMP_PREFERED_LFT __attribute__((deprecated)) = /* NOTYPO */ >> ^ >> scripts/Makefile.build:99: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.s' failed >> make[1]: *** [arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1 >> Makefile:1108: recipe for target 'prepare0' failed >> make: *** [prepare0] Error 2 >> >> It's the commit <79f0cf35dccb> ("treewide: cleanup: replace prefered with preferred"). > > After receiving a report from kisskb for failures for m68k, looking at > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/f3c452cfc59c817950b150b51ec2b33409d7640b/ > and doing some testing, it looks like this construct is supported by gcc-7 > and gcc-8, but not by gcc-4.6.3 and gcc-5. Don't know about gcc-6. I guess that's a different problem than the misspelled PREFERED before the __attribute__. -- ~Randy