From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Corey Minyard Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ipmi tree Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:34:06 -0500 Message-ID: <489f35d2-6b65-b96e-76e6-7398b066064d@acm.org> References: <20170928144537.1465e782@canb.auug.org.au> Reply-To: minyard@acm.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f195.google.com ([209.85.192.195]:33999 "EHLO mail-pf0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751339AbdI1ReJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2017 13:34:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170928144537.1465e782@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Language: en-GB Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell , Corey Minyard Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List On 09/27/2017 11:45 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Corey, > > After merging the ipmi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_platform.c:360:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_ipmi_match); > ^ > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_platform.c:360:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE' [-Werror=implicit-int] > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_platform.c:360:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_pci.c:142:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, ipmi_pci_devices); > ^ > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_pci.c:142:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE' [-Werror=implicit-int] > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_pci.c:142:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration > > Caused by commits > > a3f3086dd508 ("ipmi_si: Move platform device handling to another file") > fb5d20a966cf ("ipmi_si: Move PCI setup to another file > > Probably missing include files. > > I have added this patch for today: Hmm, I'm wondering how this got missed.  I compile tested it, of course, and lots of things compile my master rebase branch that this came from, but nothing found this.  Oh well. Thanks for handling this.  I have the fixes in and ready for next time. -corey > > From: Stephen Rothwell > Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 14:40:49 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH] ipmi_si: MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE needs module.h > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell > --- > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_pci.c | 2 +- > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_platform.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_pci.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_pci.c > index ad0b7b6ad250..99771f5cad07 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_pci.c > +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_pci.c > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ > * > * Handling for IPMI devices on the PCI bus. > */ > -#include > +#include > #include > #include "ipmi_si.h" > > diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_platform.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_platform.c > index 0e7ff0a4a151..9573f1116450 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_platform.c > +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_platform.c > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ > * coming from the platform. > */ > #include > -#include > +#include > #include > #include > #include