linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Grover <andy.grover@oracle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:22:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49ACA28F.5090906@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090303125525.1cb0baf9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 01:49:58 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 18:05:14 +1100
>>
>>> Today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
>>>
>>> net/rds/cong.c: In function 'rds_cong_set_bit':
>>> net/rds/cong.c:284: error: implicit declaration of function 'generic___set_le_bit'
>>> net/rds/cong.c: In function 'rds_cong_clear_bit':
>>> net/rds/cong.c:298: error: implicit declaration of function 'generic___clear_le_bit'
>>> net/rds/cong.c: In function 'rds_cong_test_bit':
>>> net/rds/cong.c:309: error: implicit declaration of function 'generic_test_le_bit'
>> I've fixed this up as follows:
> 
> I was actually wondering if this was some API that powerpc had not
> implemented (most other architectures include asm-generic/bitops/le.h in
> their asm/bitops.h via asm-generic/bitops/ext2-non-atomic.h or
> asm-generic/bitops/minix-le.h) or whether RDS should be using some other
> API (since this is the first use of those functions outside the headers
> above).

My 2c,

I think the correct solution is for all archs to define 
generic_*_le_bit. In addition ext2_*_bit callers (there are a bunch 
besides ext2!) should be fixed.

Some examples:

include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:#define reiserfs_test_and_set_le_bit 
ext2_set_bit
fs/udf/balloc.c:#define udf_clear_bit(nr, addr) ext2_clear_bit(nr, addr)
fs/ext4/ext4.h:#define ext4_set_bit                     ext2_set_bit

And this one:

lib/find_next_bit.c:static inline unsigned long ext2_swabp(const 
unsigned long *

^^^ cargo cult ext2 prefixing???

Regards -- Andy

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-03  3:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-02  7:05 linux-next: net tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-02  9:49 ` David Miller
2009-03-02 16:38   ` Andy Grover
2009-03-03  1:55   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-03  3:22     ` Andy Grover [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-27  2:18 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-27  4:49 ` David Miller
2010-01-11  7:42 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-11  8:02 ` David Miller
2010-01-11  8:16   ` Joe Perches
2010-01-11  8:44     ` David Miller
2010-01-11  8:49       ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-11 11:16     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2009-11-18  5:51 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-18  7:05 ` David Miller
2009-11-19 10:51   ` Shreyas Bhatewara
2009-11-14  6:50 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-14 13:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-11-09  2:21 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-09  4:41 ` David Miller
2009-10-13  4:33 Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-13  5:14 ` Michael Chan
2009-10-13  6:20   ` David Miller
2009-10-13  6:19 ` David Miller
2009-06-17  6:31 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-17  8:36 ` David Miller
2009-06-17 13:10   ` Stephen Rothwell
     [not found] <20090521001928.4bf71911.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
2009-05-20 14:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-20 19:44   ` David Miller
2009-04-24  7:01 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-24 11:53 ` David Miller
2009-04-24 11:57   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-22  0:29 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-22  0:37 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-04-22  1:12   ` David Miller
2009-04-20  1:26 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-20  1:36 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-04-20  1:43   ` David Miller
2009-04-20  1:50     ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-19  4:46 Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-19  5:40 ` David Miller
2009-04-01 19:58   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-01 21:22     ` David Miller
2009-03-30  1:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-30  1:50   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-26  2:53 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-26  4:46 ` David Miller
2009-01-26  5:15   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-26  5:17     ` David Miller
2009-01-26  8:31       ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-26 19:40         ` David Miller
2009-01-23  7:28 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-23  7:56 ` David Miller
2009-01-23  8:01   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-23  8:13     ` David Miller
2009-01-23 10:21       ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-23 10:39         ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-23 10:50           ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-24  6:27             ` David Miller
2008-12-09  6:29 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-09  8:04 ` David Miller
2008-12-09  8:54   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-09  9:05     ` David Miller
2008-12-09  9:12       ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-11-28  3:46 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-28  7:07 ` David Miller
2008-11-26  7:15 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-26  7:51 ` Herbert Xu
2008-11-26  8:45 ` David Miller
2008-11-26  9:40   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24  2:43 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24  3:56 ` David Miller
2008-11-24  4:03   ` David Miller
2008-11-24  4:25   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24  4:28     ` David Miller
2008-11-24  4:49       ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24  5:04         ` David Miller
2008-11-24  5:20           ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24  5:22             ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24  5:23             ` David Miller
2008-11-24  5:29               ` David Miller
2008-11-24  5:45                 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24  5:38               ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24 21:00                 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-24 21:52                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-11-24 22:12                     ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-25  8:42                       ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-25  9:01                         ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-21  2:44 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-21  4:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-11-21  4:13   ` David Miller
2008-11-20  2:58 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-20  2:30 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29  6:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-13  5:03 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-13  6:24 ` David Miller
2008-09-13  9:42   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-15  0:54 ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49ACA28F.5090906@oracle.com \
    --to=andy.grover@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).