linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:43:52 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0F5908.3090900@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10f740e80911261329s35f62au37e6b209c657e09@mail.gmail.com>


Hi Stephen, Geert,

Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:58, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> Today's linux-next merge of the m68knommu tree got a conflict in
>> arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h between commit
>> 63c361b65f6540043c4baabf1a044a45c7465858 ("m68k: use generic code for
>> ptrace requests") from the m68k tree and commit
>> 03a03164e8084b810e9f92906a51232d63bac72c ("m68knommu: define
>> arch_has_single_step() and friends") from the m68knommu tree.
>>
>> These mostly add the same stuff but not quite :-(
> 
> Ah sorry, my bad. I'm not yet used to the uClinux guys touching "my"
> includes ;-)
> So we need better coordination between us.
> 
> IIRC, Greg's changes were inspired by Andreas' patch.

Yes, largely they are.


>> I have done a fixup (see below) and can carry it as necessary.  Please
>> check the result.
> 
> At first sight, it looks OK. Thanks for fixing it up!

Yep, looks ok from what I can see.

Geert, how do you want to handle for the real linus merge?
Do you want me to drop the changes to ptrace.h from that patch?

Regards
Greg



>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>>
>> diff --cc arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> index eef9309,beb2091..0000000
>> --- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> +++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> @@@ -86,14 -84,15 +86,18 @@@ struct switch_stack
>>  extern void show_regs(struct pt_regs *);
>>
>>  /*
>>  - * These are defined as per linux/ptrace.h.
>>  + * These are defined as per linux/ptrace.h, which see.
>>   */
>> + struct task_struct;
>> +
>>  -#ifndef CONFIG_MMU
>>  -#define       arch_has_single_step()  (1)
>>  +#define arch_has_single_step()        (1)
>>  extern void user_enable_single_step(struct task_struct *);
>>  extern void user_disable_single_step(struct task_struct *);
>>  +
>> ++#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>>  +#define arch_has_block_step() (1)
>>  +extern void user_enable_block_step(struct task_struct *);
>> + #endif
>>
>>  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
> 						Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> 							    -- Linus Torvalds
> 


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer  --  Principal Engineer        EMAIL:     gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee                      PHONE:       +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close                             FAX:         +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia                WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-27  4:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-26  0:58 linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-26 21:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-11-27  4:43   ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2009-11-27  8:43     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-11-27 11:23       ` Greg Ungerer
2009-11-27 21:21         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-09-14  0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-14  1:21 ` Greg Ungerer
2010-09-14  8:47   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-22  1:12 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-22  6:34 ` Greg Ungerer
2011-06-22  8:29   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-23  6:12     ` Greg Ungerer
2011-11-09  0:15 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-09  0:15 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-09  7:08 ` Greg Ungerer
2011-11-09  7:13   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-11-09  7:37     ` Greg Ungerer
2011-11-09  8:19       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-11-14  0:03 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-14  0:29 ` Greg Ungerer
2019-07-01 23:09 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09  0:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-09 23:34 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-13  7:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-09 23:44 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-10  3:37 ` Michael Schmitz
2022-05-10  4:15   ` Greg Ungerer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B0F5908.3090900@snapgear.com \
    --to=gerg@snapgear.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).