From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with Linus' tree Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:20:09 +0800 Message-ID: <4BBBF9E9.4080504@redhat.com> References: <20100407125836.3c7f1095.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38627 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753337Ab0DGDQa (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2010 23:16:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100407125836.3c7f1095.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in > drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c between commit > 9e2e61fbf8ad016d24e4af0afff13505f3dd2a2a ("bonding: fix potential > deadlock in bond_uninit()") from Linus' tree and commit > 22bedad3ce112d5ca1eaf043d4990fa2ed698c87 ("net: convert multicast list to > list_head") from the net tree. > > Just context changes. If fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix > for a while. Hi, Stephen, If I read the combined diff correctly, it looks fine for me. Thanks for letting me know!