From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the block tree
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:30:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A16A7E.5030207@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121112132901.4bd52e6f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 2012-11-12 14:29, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:20:17 -0700
> Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>
>> On 2012-11-12 14:07, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:15:40 +1100
>>> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>>
>>>> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
>>>> drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.h between commit 0604fa04ccc7 ("memstick:
>>>> add support for legacy memorysticks") that use to be in the block tree
>>>> and commits "memstick: remove unused field from state struct", "memstick:
>>>> ms_block: fix compile issue", "memstick: use after free in
>>>> msb_disk_release()" and "memstick: memory leak on error in msb_ftl_scan
>>>> ()" from the akpm tree.
>>>>
>>>> The block tree commit has been dropped, so the 4 akpm tree patches no
>>>> longer have anything to apply to, so I have dropped them.
>>>
>>> Confused. Who dropped "memstick: add support for legacy memorysticks"?
>>> You, or Jens?
>>
>> I dropped it for 3.7 submission, that's why it disappeared from my
>> for-next.
>
> But linux-next is the candidate 3.8 tree, so the memstick patches
> should be in there. Or did you mean "3.8"?
Agree, and it is holding 3.8 stuff, memstick just wasn't added back
yet...
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-12 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-12 4:15 linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the block tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-12 21:07 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-12 21:20 ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-12 21:29 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-12 21:30 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-02-03 4:53 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-21 7:46 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-30 6:02 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-26 5:33 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-26 5:25 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-26 5:11 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-15 3:10 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-14 3:58 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-15 14:33 ` Asai Thambi S P
2011-10-25 9:07 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-25 18:20 ` Mike Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50A16A7E.5030207@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).