From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: hangs on boot in 9984d7394618df9 Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0600 Message-ID: <516350BE.2000106@wwwdotorg.org> References: <20130405173623.GE4068@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <515F3A71.9080008@sgi.com> <20130405210042.GH4068@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <5162E36F.5020305@sgi.com> <20130408155847.GS4068@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <51632DF8.2080402@sgi.com> <20130408212327.GU4068@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20130408214834.GV4068@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <516341ED.5060803@wwwdotorg.org> <20130408230658.GY4068@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130408230658.GY4068@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Al Viro Cc: Doug Anderson , Nathan Zimmer , Andrew Morton , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , David Woodhouse , stable@vger.kernel.org, "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 04/08/2013 05:06 PM, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 03:45:31PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>> Anyway, I've just pushed a splitup of that commit (carved in 3 pieces) >>>> into vfs.git#pipe-splitup; could you check which part triggers that >>>> hang? Should propagate in a few... >>> >>> It looks like "pipe: unify ->release() and ->open()" introduces the >>> problem. Note that I had to add a prototype for fifo_open() before the >>> structs that reference it for that commit to compile. >> >> It sounds like Stephen has provided you the info you needed so not >> doing any extra testing now, but I figured I'd chime in that I hit >> problems this morning with linux-next and it appears to be the same >> thing. I did a revert of 9984d7394618df9 and (plus a revert of a >> handful of patches to the same file) and problems are resolved. The >> failure case is really weird in that everything works well booting to >> a simple /bin/bash but fails when you do more complex tasks. >> >> Anyway: If you need some extra testing feel free to CC me. > > Folks, see if vfs.git#experimental works for you; the PITA had apparently > been caused by change of open() semantics for /proc//fd/ - > it started to behave like a FIFO, i.e. wait for peer to show up. Normally > that's not a problem, but if you have closed e.g. the write end of a pipe > and try to open /proc//fd/, you'll get open() waiting > for writers to appear. Which isn't what we used to do here (open succeeded > immediately) and apparently that was enough to trip drakut. > > Branch head should be at 574179469f7370aadb9cbac1ceca7c3723c17bee. That branch works. Thanks!