linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Shaveta Leekha <shaveta@freescale.com>,
	Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>,
	linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Removal of GENERIC_GPIO breaks -next
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:46:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <516EA0BC.2040109@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAVeFuL6qAz1OvnxtMj4jCjR3YR8C218+8oAgGRkCaWQJ_-KEg@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/17/2013 06:34 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
> Yes, I am not too worried about arc since it doesn't break anything.
> But as you mention it would be better if the whole job could be done
> by the same patch. The problem here is the merge order, for me to
> address this I need to work after your patches. 

OK I understand. Since your code touches a lot more stuff, I don't know if the
ordering should be governed by this small harmless patch alone :-)

> So maybe in the end my
> series should be merged at the end of the merge window, and after all
> architecture code is merged, to make sure I can address all instances.

You are touching a lot of arches anyways so you will have to be after them
anyways. Is that right ?

Anyhow lets park this patch for now - we can push it in the 3.10-rc cycle.

-Vineet

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-17 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-17 10:37 Removal of GENERIC_GPIO breaks -next Alexandre Courbot
2013-04-17 11:21 ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-17 12:07 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-17 13:04   ` Alexandre Courbot
2013-04-17 13:16     ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2013-04-18  7:18 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=516EA0BC.2040109@synopsys.com \
    --to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=christian.ruppert@abilis.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=shaveta@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).