From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pm tree Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 01:15:47 +0900 Message-ID: <517956B3.2000201@samsung.com> References: <20130424165417.5e2b74a01728d307e454750f@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]:34550 "EHLO mail-pd0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757164Ab3DYQPw (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:15:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130424165417.5e2b74a01728d307e454750f@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Daniel Lezcano , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim On 04/24/13 15:54, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c between commit 554c06ba3ee2 ("cpuidle: > remove en_core_tk_irqen flag") from the pm tree and commit 2eb89f893e44 > ("ARM: EXYNOS: factor out the idle states") from the arm-soc tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). Looks OK to me, thanks. - Kukjin